Search for: "Commonwealth v. Choice" Results 141 - 160 of 370
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2017, 7:24 am by Colby Pastre
Since implementation, stories have emerged of harm to local manufacturing and convenience store workers and reductions in consumer choices. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:18 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Said, 48 So.3d 121, 125 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (holding that because the Commonwealth of Virginia mandated a marriage license as a condition of marriage, and the litigants had never obtained such a license, “[t]he trial court had no choice but to determine that no legal marriage had occurred”); Farah v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:18 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Said, 48 So.3d 121, 125 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (holding that because the Commonwealth of Virginia mandated a marriage license as a condition of marriage, and the litigants had never obtained such a license, “[t]he trial court had no choice but to determine that no legal marriage had occurred”); Farah v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 12:45 pm by Sasha Volokh
In a case from last year, West Philadelphia Achievement Charter Elementary School v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 11:28 pm
|Fordham 25|Unwired Planet v Huawei: Is FRAND now a competition law free zone? [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Come prepared for a lively, interactive workshop.World Café Hosts:Dayna Matthew, University of Colorado Law SchoolCharity Scott, Georgia State University College of LawSidney Watson, Saint Louis University School of LawInvited Discussants and Participants:Rodney Adams, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Health AdministrationChristina Juris Bennett, University of Oklahoma College of LawAmy Campbell, University of Memphis Cecil C. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm by Josh Blackman
A fitting starting point is a case many lawyers are familiar with: Rector, Etc. of Holy Trinity Church v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Panopticon has examined the judgements in the cases of Ittihadieh v 5-11 Cheyne Gardens & Ors and Deer v Oxford University. [read post]