Search for: "Connor v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,357
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2022, 10:58 am
" This investigation is governed by regulations promulgated by the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Reforming the Supreme Court of the United States, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
The Court seemed to hold that in 1962, when it ruled in Engel v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
As relevant here, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion and granted the City's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
As relevant here, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion and granted the City's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:00 am
United States Justice Ginsburg – Ledbetter v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 6:56 am
According to the plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary approval of the settlement, the same court in O’Connor v. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 3:26 pm
United Airlines. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:37 am
Future historians may credit the nomination and, if confirmed, the first Black woman on the United States Supreme Court, to President Joe Biden for fulfilling a campaign promise. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 3:45 pm
" Fulton v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
United States that challenges to impeachment are non-justiciable. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:58 pm
The promise of the nation’s first Black woman on the United States Supreme Court is a dramatic, historic change. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 3:18 am
On Wednesday 2nd February, the UKSC will hand down judgment in R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited). [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 3:49 am
Perhaps about 2% of attorneys in the United States fit the self-imposed requirement. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:06 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June 2021 Basfar… [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 6:01 am
On June 2, 2021, the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Maryland unsealed an indictment naming Mr. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 1:21 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June 2021 Basfar… [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:32 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June 2021 Basfar… [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 6:39 pm
Biden, decided today by Judge Reed O'Connor (N.D. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
" This basic principle, namely that the requirement of probable cause to permit entry into a private home is not excused based upon any relative perceived societal importance, was further articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Mincey v. [read post]
