Search for: "Cook v. Fair"
Results 141 - 160
of 686
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 8:00 am
Arace v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 8:29 am
New Relists Brennan v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 5:12 pm
Weglarz v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 1:52 pm
Returning Relists Andrus v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm
An Australian law firm’s “Tips and tricks for online hearings” refers to a ruling by the Federal Court of Australia that a case with 50 witnesses that was scheduled for six weeks would proceed virtually, despite the objection of one of the parties (Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited (Adjournment)). [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:03 am
New Relists Mance v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 8:01 am
” Coons v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 9:26 am
Long v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 5:45 pm
Wilson v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 5:45 pm
Wilson v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:32 pm
” 735 ILCS 5/1-1301(e) Judges want to be fair (it’s in their nature). [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:32 pm
” 735 ILCS 5/1-1301(e) Judges want to be fair (it’s in their nature). [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 8:00 am
Gemme v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 1:53 am
This gave another view on the issues introduced earlier in the day from Trevor Cook’s perspective as a practitioner. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 3:00 am
Hills v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:48 am
Of course, we want researchers to be incentivised to tackle COVID-19, but the question is whether patents are the most appropriate way to do so.Trevor CookTrevor Cook (WilmerHale)then gave an overview of regulatory exclusivities in the EU and US, mainly focussing on data exclusivity and market exclusivity. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am
Karlin v. [read post]
