Search for: "Cooper v. County Board of Review of Grant County"
Results 141 - 160
of 163
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
At its February 25 meeting, the Board will consider reversing its adoption of the protocol pending a legally required review of environmental impacts to forests and the climate. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:17 pm
With that, the Board determined no further CEQA review of Route C1 was required prior to the execution of the Agreement. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
Opinion below (11th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Title: Haskell County Board of Commissioners v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
Click Here California Dairy Gives County a Gas Detection System, Settling Case. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
Click Here California Dairy Gives County a Gas Detection System, Settling Case. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
In a strongly worded order issued last week, a district judge overturned a 2008 state ruling that granted the authority permission to tap groundwater from three valleys in central Lincoln County. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:10 am
(San Diego County v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
We conclude our review with some predictions for the year ahead. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Mukasey, No. 07-60740 Petition for review of a final order of removal is denied where: 1) a prior cancellation of removal did not erase petitioner's conviction for possession of marijuana for immigration purposes, and that conviction was admissible in the removal proceeding; and 2) petitioner's equal-protection challenge failed because he did not demonstrate that he was similarly situated to other aliens who were granted admission. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Some academic critics of Roe v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 10:03 pm
Upon request of the City, the Supreme Court granted review. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:27 pm
R U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, November 26, 2008 Cooper v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
7 May 2008, 10:43 am
In the Committee for Green Foothills v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
., Inc. v. 907 Corp., Dr. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Record labels sue Baidu over providing links to file-sharing sites: (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360), (Copyfight), Merck’s Fosamax patent expires: Watson Pharmaceuticals to distribute authorized generic version, Teva and Barr also launch FDA approved generic versions: (SmartBrief), (Patent Circle),… [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 12:36 am
Title690
S1325B
LANZA -- Creates the thirteenth judicial district consisting of the county of Richmond 689
S6521
MAZIARZ -- Makes provisions for the deaths or permanent or temporary disabilities of employees of voluntary hospitals in connection with the World Trade Center attacks 688
S6514
NOZZOLIO -- Relates to compensation, benefits and conditions of employment for certain state officers and employees who are members of the… [read post]