Search for: "Cooper v. Smith" Results 141 - 160 of 737
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2010, 4:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
Cooper was ready with a precedent of his own, the Court’s 1982 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 am by INFORRM
A cause of action is “a factual situation the existence of which entitles one person to obtain from the court a remedy against another person” (Letang v Cooper [1965] 1 QB 232, 242-243 (Diplock LJ); Roberts v Gill [2011] 1 AC 240, [2010] UKSC 22 (19 May 2010) [41] (Lord Collins); Murphy v O’Toole [2014] IEHC 486 (17 October 2014) [57]-[58] (Baker J); see also PR v KC [2014] IEHC 126 (11 March 2014) [36] (Baker J), but note Clarke… [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 11:29 am by Bexis
, in 2010, the Second Circuit in the Zyprexa litigation had affirmed sanctions against one of the lawyers who cooperated with Dr. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 11:14 am by Dennis Crouch
"  Douglas quotes the 1882 case of Atlantic Works v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:03 am
Finding for the plaintiffs, the Court of Appeals of Indiana held: "we find that there was probative evidence that [cooperative’s] losses were due to a failure to hedge. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 7:14 am by admin
Smith   [Continued from yesterday's Part 3 and the preceding Part 2  and Part 1.] [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 12:56 pm by Jon Sands
Smith) --- On remand from the Supreme Court, see  135 S. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:12 am
324/09 L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie, L’Oréal (UK) Limited v eBay International AG, eBay Europe SARL and eBay (UK) Limited (see Part I for background, Part II for the ruling and an easy summary). [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 5:09 am by Terry Hart
Adam Smith couldn’t possibly have predicted what would happen in the face of intangible, easily copyable assets and hyper-globalisation. [read post]