Search for: "Cotter v Cotter"
Results 141 - 160
of 238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2014, 2:00 pm
Icon Health and Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 12:37 am
Professor Thomas Cotter recently shared a couple of thoughts on Sisvel v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 6:18 am
So far, Huawei v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 4:02 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 3:48 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
Evan Lee previews United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:20 am
In the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Daniel Cotter looks at the potential for a Supreme Court vacancy and the so-called “McConnell rule” on filling vacancies during an election year. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 3:31 pm
Tom Cotter on the economic analysis of IP law.Design After several well-known lawsuits, Barbie is back in the courtroom. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 11:26 am
Qualcomm as well as Apple v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 8:25 am
(Cotter.2020.TwoErrors.pdf) Jasper L. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 10:37 pm
On page 3, that one specifically points to the Mannheim Regional Court's Nokia v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:17 am
| Brussels court grants Louboutin inhibitory decision against Amazon | Planet Art v Photobox passing off: no compunction when refusing injunction | On economic analysis of IP law: an interview with professor Tom Cotter | Calls for holistic reforms to digital platforms from Australia’s competition regulator | Enterprise name vs. trade mark: throwing a straw against the wind? [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:55 am
Just over a year ago, a federal district court in California ruled, in Cotter v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 4:20 am
” The latest episode of Strict Scrutiny (podcast) includes discussions of “the Court’s death penalty docket, the Armed Career Criminal Act cases from this past term, and Justice Kavanaugh’s opinion in Flowers v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:21 am
Bauer, Thomas Hazelton, Douglas V. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 5:16 am
In an essay for the Regulatory Review’s ongoing Supreme Court series, Rachel Rebouché explains what Roberts’ concurring opinion in June Medical Services v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
Commentary comes from Gene Quinn at IP Watchdog and Thomas Cotter at Comparative Patent Remedies. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required), Daniel Cotter looks at Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurring opinion in Gamble v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 3:40 am
The first is in Seila Law v. [read post]
