Search for: "Coughlin v. Coughlin" Results 141 - 160 of 209
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2012, 3:10 am by New Books Script
25 new acquisitions for the Osgoode Hall Law School Library, including 23 from 2012: HV 8599 G8 K45 2012 This side of silence : human rights, torture, and the recognition of cruelty Tobias Kelly. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 8:51 am by Eugene Volokh
Coughlin (N.Y. 1996)), because Alcoholics Anonymous has a religious dimension. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 3:58 am
Appointing authority threatening to do what it has a legal right to do is not “coercion”Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643 Suppose an employee entitled to pre-termination “notice and hearing” is told that unless he or she immediately resigns from his or her position, he or she will be served with disciplinary charges. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 3:27 am
Citing Griffin v Coughlin, 88 NY2d 674, the Appellate Division pointed out that “[t]here is no firmer or more settled principle of Establishment Clause jurisprudence than that prohibiting the use of the State’s power to force one to profess a religious belief. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:07 pm by Walter Olson
More: ABA Journal; City of Livonia Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:49 am
”Noting that paragraph 9 of the PBA’s petition seeking to compel arbitration itself confirm that the parties understood that the DEP would be a probationary period, the Appellate Division said that “This clear meaning and understanding of the parties is in complete harmony with the meaning and use of DEPs in similar reported cases,” citing Matter of Miller v Coughlin, 59 NY2d 490, 493; and Matter of McGough v State of New York, 243 AD2d 983, 983-984… [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:52 am
In Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643, a case involving a tenured State employee, the Court of Appeals said the employer could threaten the employee with disciplinary action if he or she did not resign. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:07 am
”In affirming the lower court’s decision the Appellate Division observed that Supreme Court’s “findings of fact, based in large measure on its assessment of the credibility of the witnesses,” were supported by a fair interpretation of the record evidence.Addressing Buric allegations that “he was given two unpalatable choices,* or that he chose the service retirement due to financial considerations,” the Appellate Division said that neither constituted… [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:36 am
Using tape-recorded testimony in an administrative proceedingMiller v Howard Safir, App. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 4:00 am
This was demonstrated in the Appellate Division’s ruling in Taylor v Cass, 505 NYS2d 929. [read post]