Search for: "Creative Marketing v. AT&T" Results 141 - 160 of 987
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2014, 7:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  In the 1990s, the swing was in favor of too much protection—Harper & Row v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 7:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  This is a watershed—you can be creative in design patent application. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 12:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Only 4 cited © cases: Mazer v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Remembering the inherent dignity of that labor, and its value whether or not there is a market for the resulting creativity, is a goal that the OTW shares with the Copyright Office. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:22 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  © as restriction of creativity: people want to use other people’s work, but you can create a work from scratch and then you don’t need to worry. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
But none reached the market despite millions in R&D from National Institute of Justice. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 8:00 am by Sasha Volokh
The very next day, the Court decided 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 3:22 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
What’s more important to society, copying or creativity? [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 12:45 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
We are also concerned w/incentives: we don’t seem to be experiencing a shortage of recipe-related creativity, or dam-related creativity, or polka-related creativity—interaction b/t incentive costs and administrative costs helps explain the screen. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 12:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Those markets obviously depend on definition of goods sold in them, and that can’t be ignored. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 3:12 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Social norms/marketers guilds have replaced that with a de facto exclusivity norm. [read post]