Search for: "Crosby v. Crosby" Results 141 - 160 of 312
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2014, 3:04 am by Peter Mahler
The Co-op at 55 Crosby Street According to the complaint in Akasa (read here), the subject property is “a luxury cooperative designed by three well-known architects including Frank Gehry” located at 55 Crosby Street in the fashionable Soho district of Manhattan. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 4:21 pm
Even more remarkably, the other party to the case represents the estate of Crosby's first wife, who died more than 60 years ago.Crosby v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 9:40 pm by Gordon Firemark
  Famous Dead People - 9th Circuit reverses invalidation of Washington’s Right of Publicity Law     http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jimi-hendrix-estate-wins-appeal-675297   (Putative) BING CROSBY HEIRS  LOSE CLAIM http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/bing-crosbys-first-wife-denied-675755   ‘Blurred Lines’ Lawsuit: Sony/ATV Settles With Marvin Gaye’s Family Hollywood Reporter. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  Rares J struck out certain particulars of the defence of contextual truth but refused the application in relation to the defence of qualified privilege (Crosby v Kelly [2013] FCA 1343) There is a report of the decision in The Age. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 12:12 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In the People v Crosby the defendant with an attorney gave a confession which tarnished his chances of an acquittal. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 11:07 am by Devlin Hartline
Crosbie Fitch believes that copyright grants authors “unethical privileges” over others. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:02 pm by INFORRM
In July 2012 the Federal Court rejected an application by Dr Kelly to have the action struck out on the basis that the Federal Court did not have jurisdiction (Crosby v Kelly [2012] FCAFC 96). [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 12:02 pm by Simon Lester
  A word search shows this is only the fifth time a Supreme Court opinion has mentioned the WTO, along with Crosby v NFTC (2000), JEM Ag Supply v Pioneer Hi-Bred (2001), United Haulers v Oneida-Herkimer (2007), and Golan v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 6:49 am by Jeff Gamso
Holmes probably believed what he wrote in Abrams, just as he believed what her wrote in Schenck v. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 10:09 am by Blogspot
The first issue of the 'New Journal of European Criminal Law' (a continuation of the Journal of European Criminal Law) has just been published and contains various ECHR-related articles: * Editorial: Taxquet v Belgium, R v Ponting, Trials by Jury and a Homage to Neil MacCormick, by Scott Crosby; * Survey of Instances of Non-Compliance with Interim Measures Adopted under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, by the Registry of the European Court of Human Rights; * Decisions of the… [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:59 am by Lawrence Solum
Notwithstanding the Court's citation of Ashwander v. [read post]