Search for: "Cross v. Evans"
Results 141 - 160
of 337
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2015, 4:05 pm
In the case of Aleksandra & Ljiljana Gacic & Branislav Ciric v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd & Matthew Evans ([2015] NSWCA 99) the NSW Court of Appeal increased the $160,000 damages awarded to each of three former restaurateurs defamed by a Sydney Morning Herald review twelve years ago. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
Hodges (Ohio), Tanco v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 4:03 am
Furthermore, ‘by allowing the debate about the Constitution and the Euro to be viewed as an extension of domestic party politics it understates the cross-party and non-party divide on these issues. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 2:19 am
Freedom of Information The Panopticon blog examines FOI requests into the diary of Andrew Lansley, and provides a fresh perspective on Evans. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:19 pm
Chapin, 299 AD2d 294; Kent v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 8:58 am
This post is cross-posted at Text and History. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am
The charges were complex, as the jurors were asked to assess whether leaks by public officials crossed the line from conduct that would warrant disciplinary action to “criminal conduct”. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm
Canada In the case of Focus Graphite Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm
On 19 February 2015, District Court Judge Judith Gibson summarily dimissed the claim in the case of Time for Monkey Enterprises v Southern Cross Austereo [2015] NSWDC 13. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 12:03 am
The Moscow Red Cross is suing seventeen news agencies for defamation. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm
On cross-examination, Agent Gonzalez acknowledged that Jerel had been present in the courthouse the previous day.U.S. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court heard argument in Elonis v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 3:15 am
R (on the application of Evans) v Her Majesty’s Attorney General and another is examining whether they can be disclosed under the Freedom of Information Act, following a request from Rob Evans of The Guardian. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 1:24 pm
In fact, paragraph 14 of the Decision reads as follows:The decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in ESA v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
The case, Ohio v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:04 am
Evans. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court said in Arizona v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:46 am
No statements made or other information provided by Michael Scott, will be used by the United States Attorney directly against him, except for purposes of cross-examination and/or impeachment. . . . [read post]
8 May 2014, 1:21 pm
See Entertainment Software Association v. [read post]
