Search for: "D. C-W." Results 141 - 160 of 4,265
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2023, 2:29 pm
She looked at me and w- — all of a sudden and said, “Would you like to have a photograph? [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 1:50 pm by Daniel Bosch
Removed the term “significantly affect” and its definition in its entirety from 40 CFR 120.2(c)(6) and 33 CFR 328.3(c)(6). [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 11:06 pm by Marcel Pemsel
The AG’s Opinion Questions (c) and (d) The AG responded to questions (c) and (d) first and together. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 5:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Indiana (1973) the Court held that because Hess's statement "[w]e'll take the f—ing street later" or "[w]e'll take the f–ing street again" at an antiwar demonstration was not directed to any person, it could not be incitement and was protected speech. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
” Another simple explanation: “[W]hat ChatGPT is always fundamentally trying to do is to produce a ‘reasonable continuation’ of whatever text it’s got so far, whereby ‘reasonable’ we mean ‘what one might expect someone to write after seeing what people have written on billions of webpages, etc. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 5:11 pm by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 60/224(d) “Any unnecessary delay—for a home study or for some other reason—thwarts the purpose of section 224(d) and may result in a denial of due process. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Intitulé : Syndic de Souaber, 2023 QCCA 1066Juridiction : Cour d’appel (C.A.), MontréalDécision de : Juges Martin Vauclair, Stephen W. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Tad Lipsky
Jackson endeared himself to FDR by aggressively prosecuting—some would say abusively—Andrew W. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:17 am by Eugene Volokh
.'" Thus, "[w]here a call to others to act neither conveys a plan to act nor is likely to produce imminent danger, it may not be criminalized, despite its unsettling message. [read post]