Search for: "D. R.C. D." Results 141 - 160 of 305
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2018, 9:42 am by MBettman
Bode, 2015-Ohio-1519 (“[A]n adjudication of delinquency may not be used to enhance the penalty for a later offense under R.C. 4511.19(G)(1)(d) when the adjudication carried the possibility of confinement, the adjudication was uncounseled, and there was no effective waiver of the right to counsel. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:35 am by MBettman
Key Precedent Ohio Constitution, Article II, Section 15(D) (“No bill shall contain more than one subject, which shall be clearly expressed in its title. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:06 am by Russ Bensing
Three weeks ago, I’d also blogged about the oral argument in State v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:14 am by MBettman
Pursuant to R.C. 2929.03(D)(3), the trial court may sentence a defendant to death only if the court finds, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the aggravating circumstances in a case outweigh any mitigating factors. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The statute defines "mental distress" as "[a]ny mental illness or condition that involves some temporary substantial incapacity," R.C. 2903.211(D)(2)(a), or that "would normally require psychiatric treatment, psychological treatment, or other mental health services," R.C. 2903.211(D)(2)(b). [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 7:32 am by MBettman
Both parties agree that the four year statute of limitations in R.C. 2305.09(D) applies, but disagree about when it started to run. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 5:00 am by DaytonDUI
Boczar, 113 Ohio St. 3d 148, 2007-Ohio-1251, 863 N.E.2d 155 (2007), upholding the constitutionality of R.C. 4511.19(D)(4)(b). [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 4:55 pm by Sarah Grant
These RC provisions are in addition to the provisions for excusal of defense counsel under R.M.C. 505(d)(2)(B). [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 2:11 am
" After former Aggie football coach R.C. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 12:19 pm by MBettman
¶ 1 of syllabus: “An action by a vendee against the builder-vendor of a completed residence for damages proximately caused by failure to construct in a workmanlike manner using ordinary care – a duty imposed by law – is an action in tort to which the four-year statute of limitations set forth in R.C. 2305.09(D) applies. [read post]