Search for: "D.J. v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 422
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2013, 7:42 am
The Court of Appeals has held that the Americans with Disabilities Act may require the state to waive certain eligibility deadlines if waiver would reasonably accommodate a disabled person under the Act.The case is Mary Jo C. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 5:54 am
And, there is no prejudice to the state in this case as a result of plaintiff's failure to comply with the court's rules, as the delay did not increase the likelihood that evidence favorable to the state in this case would have been lost because of the delay. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:24 am
The Court of Appeals strikes down the law under the Equal Protection Clause.The case is Dandamudi v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 4:25 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:09 am
The problem for plaintiff in Castagna v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 7:32 am
In 1991, the Supreme Court said in Wyatt v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 9:38 am
” Brown v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 7:08 am
The seminal case in this area is Glatt v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 2:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 6:40 am
The trial court granted summary judgment on this claim in favor of the State, but the Court of Appeals brings the case back, and unless the case settles, it looks like this case will proceed to trial.The case is Brandon v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 9:37 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 7:55 am
So it's always news when the Second Circuit rules that a conviction was in fact unconstitutional, which is what happened here in this homicide case.The case is Orlando v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 6:17 am
The Second Circuit (Lynch, Lohier and Reiss [D.J.]) joins the crowd and holds that "Section 1981 does not provide a separate private right of action against state actors. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 5:53 am
" Gowins v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 7:44 am
The answer is no.The case is Palma v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 7:04 am
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:47 am
This one does.The case is Walker v. [read post]
