Search for: "DIAMOND v. US "
Results 141 - 160
of 1,058
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2020, 10:55 am
Club Exploria, LLC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2020, 11:20 am
In re Diverging Diamond Interchange Act 250, 2020 VT 98. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 4:08 pm
An example of this occurred in the case of Arko Plumbing Corp. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 10:29 am
Skinner v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 2:33 pm
” – Justice Scalia in Holland v Illinois. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 1:11 pm
The insured traded gold, cash and diamonds at its business premises. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
"The term 'prior restraint' is used to describe administrative and judicial orders forbidding certain communications when issued in advance of the time that such communications are to occur. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 9:48 am
Where the holder requires exclusive or other use of the whole or any portion of the prospecting or mining area, the holder has an obligation to acquire a lease to use the same as agreed between such holder and the landowner or lawful occupier. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:41 pm
Finally, Diamond tried to get the court to adopt the rule of Novartis Consumer Health, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 8:17 am
The district court’s judgment was vacated and the case remanded for trial (Tiffany and Company v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 10:15 am
Blue Diamond Growers, 757 F. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 1:47 pm
Costco argued below that its use of Tiffany was a permissible fair use because it did not constitute use as a mark, was descriptive of the diamond setting, and was in good faith. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 7:15 am
In November 2012, a customer alerted Tiffany that Costco was selling diamond engagement rings that she believed were being... [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 7:15 am
On August 17, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated and remanded a decision of the district court in Tiffany & Co. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
Diamond & Gold Jewelers, Inc., 70 Ohio App. 3d 667, 671, 591 N.E.2d 881, 884 (2d Dist. 1991), and Connor Group v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 1:27 pm
After the Supreme Court decided Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 1:11 pm
Tiffany & Co. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 4:22 am
In this context, she briefly explained the case MZ Wallace, Inc v Fuller d/n/a The Oliver Thomas & Black Diamond, No. 18-2665 (SDNY, Dec. 2018), in which the plaintiff claimed the defendants infringed its trade dress rights in quilting handbags. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 10:04 am
Abrams' opinion in Reynolds v. [read post]
