Search for: "DISTRICT VENUES LLC" Results 141 - 160 of 831
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2021, 10:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Circuit, in an opinion by then-Judge Kavanaugh, held that the D.C. anti-SLAPP statute is a procedural rule that doesn't apply in D.C. federal district court. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 1:59 pm by Poole Huffman, LLC
So, what happens if your commercial contract contains a venue selection clause but no choice of law provision? [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 2:11 am by Florian Mueller
In addition, on information and belief, Microsoft has not disputed that venue is proper in this District in cases filed against it in this District. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 9:31 am by Melissa E. Scott
Moreover, applying the initial appellate venue choice to all later TTAB decisions would unfairly bind the initial winning party to the decision not to force district court review. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 11:11 am by Dennis Crouch
Most litigation regarding venue transfer is inter-district — from one district to another district. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am by Dennis Crouch
As Silicon Valley’s home venue, the Northern District of California entertains numerous patent cases. [read post]
Nashville Underground LLC—“nationally acclaimed, seven-story restaurant, bar, night club and live music venue” located in downtown Nashville—procured a commercial property policy from AMCO Insurance Company to protect it from fortuitous catastrophic events. [read post]
Nashville Underground LLC—“nationally acclaimed, seven-story restaurant, bar, night club and live music venue” located in downtown Nashville—procured a commercial property policy from AMCO Insurance Company (AMCO) to protect it from fortuitous catastrophic events. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 7:05 am by MaxVal
Parties Case ID Venue Filing Date Close Date Outcome Patents-in-suit Stratasys Inc. vs Microboards Technology, LLC 0:13-cv-03228 Minnesota District Court 25 Nov 2013 13 Jun 2016 Likely Settlement US8349239B2 | US5866058A | US5653925A | US6004124A Objet Geometries vs 3D Systems, Inc. 0:05-cv-00136 Minnesota District Court 21 Jan 2005 23 Aug 2005 N/A US5287435A | US5519816A | US5386500A Patent Litigation Events: U.S. district court cases closed between… [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 10:49 am by Kenan Farrell
Henke of TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLPDefendant: BP Holdings Company, LLC, Seattle Bouldering Project, LLC, Minneapolis Bouldering Project, LLC, and Austin Bouldering Project, LLCCause: Invalidity or Unenforceability of Intellectual Property Rights, Non-Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights, Non-Violation of Alleged Trade SecretsCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Jane Magnus-StinsonReferred To: Mark J. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 4:56 pm by Adam Levitin
The NRA is claiming Dallas venue on the basis of an affiliate's previous filing in the district. [read post]