Search for: "DOE et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al" Results 141 - 160 of 344
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2010, 4:30 am
Sandoz Pharmaceuticals GmbH et al (EPLAW) Prilosec (Omeprazole) – US: AstraZeneca ordered to pay attorney’s fees for ‘baseless’ suit to protect Prilosec OTC: AstraZeneca AB et al. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 9:50 am by gstasiewicz
Clinton, et al. on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia). [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Report and Blog)   Global - Patents New exchange, Intellectual Property Exchange International, can be a game-changer, but will need good patents to thrive (IAM) (Technology Transfer Tactics)   Australia Bittersweet decision for Mars but Cadbury settles purple dispute: Mars Australia Pty Ltd v Sweet Rewards Pty Ltd (Managing IP) (ipwars)   Belgium Belgian Supreme Court prohibits fishing expeditions: Ineos Manufacturing Belgium NV and Ineos… [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 10:22 am by INFORRM
Arkansas Times LP v Mark Waldrip, et al, No. 19-1378 (8th Circuit, 2022). [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 11:14 am by FDABlog HPM
Regenerative Sciences, LLC et. al., Untied States District Court for the District of Columbia, August 6, 2010 (“Complaint”) at 3, 5. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:02 am
The appeal in 07-290 (District of Columbia v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:42 am by Lyle Denniston
The case of Nordyke, et al., v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 9:13 am by emagraken
Richards et al, 2015 ONSC 6983, in support of their position. [read post]