Search for: "Danielle N. v. ADES"
Results 141 - 160
of 273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
” Writing for Newsweek’s The Gaggle blog, Daniel Stone adds that “[i]n some ways she came out looking better than before [the hearings], humanizing herself with a number of charming one-liners that earned the favor of Republicans who began the hearings determined to find something—anything—problematic with her record. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
(TTABlog) TTAB affirms mere descriptiveness refusal of JEWELRYSUPPLY.COM: No tacking and not enough 2(f): In re Jewelry Supply Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms refusal of the “Eddie Bauer Guarantee” for failure to function as a service mark: In re Eddie Bauer Licensing Services LLC (TTABlog) TTAB dismisses fraud-based opposition for failure to prove intent to deceive: Daniel Ryan Way and CMDW, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
See RUPA ยง 405; Daniel S. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:06 am
Daniel Samudio, No. 10-0554 (DB) (Lehrmann, J.). [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:36 am
Caleb Cushing, On the Study of the Civil Law, 11 N. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 12:46 pm
A host of commentators (respectively, Ashley Deeks, Jack Goldsmith, Daniel Bethlehem, Goldsmith again, Fionnuala Ní Aoláin and Marty Lederman) have weighed-in on why Egan’s definition of “imminence” may seem familiar. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
R., 2023 QCCA 651Juridiction : Cour d’appel (C.A.), MontréalDécision de : Juges Guy Gagnon, Michel Beaupré et Daniel Dumais (ad hoc)Date : 12 mai 2023 Résumé PÉNAL (DROIT) — détermination de la peine — opérations frauduleuses — fraude — fraude de plus de 5 000 $ — fraude envers le gouvernement — accusé entrepreneur — plaidoyer de culpabilité… [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:46 am
In one sense, this is a strange question to be asking, since the government says it already has a considered position, as described by White House Cybersecurity Coordinator, Michael Daniel: “[I]n the majority of cases, responsibly disclosing a newly discovered vulnerability is clearly in the national interest. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
But the Supreme Court, in its 1977 decision in Zacchini v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:00 am
(Remember when paying for cable television was justified on the basis that you wouldn’t have to see ads?) [read post]
1 May 2018, 2:27 pm
Daniel Isenschmid, a toxicologist, who supervised the lab's report but apparently observed none of the testing. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 11:11 pm
J. 30 *** Daniel M. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm
In Loan Ass’n v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 6:50 am
(TSI): Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:18 am
” The DOJ, however, believes that American Library Ass’n v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 1:25 pm
” The DOJ, however, believes that American Library Ass’n v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 5:51 am
[quoting West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Fund, Inc. v Gantt, 796 F Supp 681, 684 [ED NY 1992]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Fund, Inc. v Gantt, 796 F Supp 681, 684 [ED NY 1992]). [read post]
