Search for: "Davis v. Clear et al"
Results 141 - 153
of 153
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2007, 2:22 pm
As a matter of full disclosure, Joondeph also served as a consultant for the State and Local Legal Center in the preparation of its amicus brief for the Government Finance Officers of America et al. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 11:08 am
George Ralston, et al - "Unlike Ind. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 11:24 am
Marcella McDaniel, et al (NFP) - "William and Anita Sciscoe (collectively the Sciscoes) appeal the trial court's denial of their summary judgment motion in their quiet title action, as well as the grant of summary judgment in favor of Marcella McDaniel, personal representative of the estate of John Davis (the Estate), on the Estate's complaint for foreclosure. *** We affirm. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 11:34 am
For publication opinions today (3): Anita Stuller, et al v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 10:13 am
Tippmann Enterprises, et al. , a 6-page opinion, Judge Darden writes:ISSUE: Whether Wells Fargo Bank owed a duty to Bowman to clear ice and snow from the sidewalk adjacent to its property. [read post]
District Court Invalidates Merck's Formulation Patent on Pepcid Complete, Relying on KSR v. Teleflex
6 Jun 2007, 9:00 pm
McNeil-PPC et al. v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Parke-Davis, 733 P.2d 507, 515-16 (Wash. 1987); Bond v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 1:58 pm
Frederick Motz.In response to a pro se action, State defendants filed a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment and were granted the motion to dismiss.The Court found that Davis' claims arose out of a peer review process in which defendants were engaged, and the law is clear that to the extent Davis was seeking monetary damages against defendants, all of them were entitled to absolute immunity in connection with their peer review activities.Further, to the extent… [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
Instead, he concluded that the Respondent's unilateral action was unlawful because the Respondent hired a workforce consisting solely of its predecessor's Union-represented employees and that the Respondent was a "perfectly clear" successor within the meaning of NLRB v. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 8:09 am
Law Judge Steven Davis issued his decision March 21, 2001. *** Dow Chemical Co. (7-CA-43257, et al., 7-CB-12626; 349 NLRB No. 11) Midland, MI Jan. 29, 2007. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 9:08 am
Basic Industries, Inc. (15-CA-17525, et al.; 348 NLRB No. 89) Baton Rouge, LA Dec. 18, 2006. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
.) *** ELC Electric, Inc. (25-CA-28270-1, et al.; 348 NLRB No. 17) Indianapolis, IN Sept. 28, 2006. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 8:25 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
