Search for: "Davis v. Doe" Results 141 - 160 of 3,806
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2023, 10:59 am by Giles Peaker
Nevertheless, in my judgment, that does not mean that that the application should be struck out or there is nothing for the FTT to consider under section 27A. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
Nor does the “engage” prong extend to inaction—for example, failing to take action with regard to an insurrection or rebellion.Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm by Josh Blackman
Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
” X does not define what it considers biometric, though other companies have used the term to describe data gleaned from a person’s face, eyes and fingerprints. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 11:20 am by Giles Peaker
The freeholder’s main argument was that the FTT had applied the wrong test on whether the costs were reasonable, citing this passage from Continental Property Ventures Ltd v White (2007) L&TR 4 “The question of what the cost of repair is does not depend upon whether the repairs ought to have been allowed to accrue. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of the retainer” (Genesis Merchant Partners, L.P. v Gilbride, Tusa, Last & Spellane, LLC, 157 AD3d 479, 482; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428). [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 10:46 am by Dennis Crouch
Hilton Davis Chemical Co., 520 U.S. 17 (1997). [read post]