Search for: "Davison v. Davison" Results 141 - 160 of 178
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2012, 6:09 pm by INFORRM
This was hinted at as far back as Bunt v Tilley (very briefly), then in Kaschke v Gray and considered most recently in Davison v Habeeb – but Tamiz is the clearest example yet (albeit still as a dismissal at an early stage of proceedings). [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 11:17 pm by INFORRM
He referred to Davison v Habeeb 2011 EWHC 3031 QB where HHJ Parkes QC found there was an arguable case that Google was a publisher and was liable post-notification. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:10 pm by Daithí
This was hinted at as far back as Bunt v Tilley (very briefly), then in Kaschke v Gray and considered most recently in Davison v Habeeb - but Tamiz is the clearest example yet (albeit still as a dismissal at an early stage of proceedings). [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Mahmood, Constitutional Forum, Centre for Constitutional Studies, Forthcoming ‘Newspaper Libel: With Special Emphasis on Indian Case Law’, Nayan Banerjee, National Law School of India University (NLSIU) ‘Defamation Outside Reputation: Proposals for the Reform of English Law‘, Eric Descheemaeker, University of Edinburgh – School of Law, U. of Edinburgh School of Law Working Paper No. 2011/41 ‘New York Times Co. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:29 am by INFORRM
This question was addressed in the case of Davison v Habeeb ([2011] EWHC 3031 (QB)) handed down on 25 November 2011 by HHJ Parkes QC (sitting as a judge of the High Court). [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:08 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Modaresi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 1359 (23 November 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Davison v Habeeb & Ors [2011] EWHC 3031 (QB) (25 November 2011) Eden v Rubin [2011] EWHC 3090 (QB) (24 November 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Harvey v Director of Public Prosecutions [2011] EWHC B1 (Admin) (17 November 2011) J, R (on the… [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The PCC also published the following “resolved” cases on 25 November: Sir Alan Davies Daily Mail, Clause 10; Kenneth Brewster The Sun, Clause 1; Adam Bradford The Star (Sheffield), Clause 1; Karen Coleman Brentwood Gazette, Clause 1; CLEAR The Sun, Clause 1; Mrs Maria Blamires Daily Mail, Clause 5; Mrs Maria Blamires Daily Mirror, Clause 5; Lord Triesman The Mail on Sunday, Clauses 1, 3 and 10; Resolved – London Borough of Sutton v Sutton [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 7:01 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
In this post, we give links to resources that are currently available on the 2012 Rules.Comparison with Other Rules: UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, 1976 v ICC Rules Old ICC Rules v New ICC Rules ICC Rules v AAA Rules ICC Rules v LCIA RulesDescription of the New Rules:Hogan Lovells , Michael Davison , Simon Nesbitt and Kieron O'Callaghan, The New ICC Rules UncoveredICC New Arbitration Rules of 2012: Fulbright AlertNew ICC Arbitration Rules - A Commentary… [read post]
30 May 2011, 9:26 am by INFORRM
At 10.30am there were judgments from Mr Justice Tugendhat in TSE v News Group and Goodwin v News Group. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 10:20 am by WSLL
Davison of Patton & Davison, Cheyenne, Wyoming.Representing Appellee Deborah J. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:15 am
”**Considering Gibbons’ “repeated acts of insubordination, absences, and untimely completion of transcripts,” the Appellate Davison said that the penalty imposed, termination, did not shock its sense of fairness.* Substantial evidence is defined as "such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a conclusion or ultimate fact"** Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 12:41 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
  Since this symposium marks the 25th Anniversary of Batson v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 9:23 pm by uwlegalscholarship
Davison, (641) 512-4944, collin.davison [at] drake.edu or law.review [at] drake.edu] as soon as possible. [read post]