Search for: "Deal v. Warner"
Results 141 - 160
of 420
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
https://t.co/aZq03eBYJm -> Statutory damages for copyright infringement of 20k per wok infringed awarded RE/MAX v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:56 am
Warner/Chappell, 2:13-cv-04460-GHK-MRW (C.D. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
TPP Unlikely to Be Approved Before End of Obama's Term https://t.co/ljsrbJBt8O -> Big endorsement for Obama trade deal https://t.co/0M4mRfvS9g -> CASL – year in review https://t.co/S1f5c1sx6A -> U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
https://t.co/ESHLtzDlTe -> Canadian anti-spam law: A compliance guide for sales pros https://t.co/ESHLtzDlTe -> Commil v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 2:45 pm
” So what’s the big deal about signing a form? [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm
Judge King in Marya v Warner/Chapell Music determined that the copyright filed by Summy Co. in 1935 granted the rights to the specific piano arrangements of the music, not the music itself. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 6:19 am
Trubridge, who had once been in a successful 70s pop band, said his band got just 3% of the 'recorded music' share of any stream - with his label (who were originally Magnet, now owned by Warners) taking the rest - 97%. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 12:34 am
No need for Pregabalin(e) injunction, say the FrenchAfter Jeremy's post on the decision of Mr Justice Arnold in Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz Ltd and Lloyds Pharmcacy Ltd [2015] EWHC 3153 (Pat), in the Patents Court, England and Wales, to extend an interim injunction in an ongoing patent infringement dispute over pregabalin, here, Katfriend Grégoire Triet (Avocat au Barreau de Paris and a partner in the… [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 3:41 pm
Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz Ltd and Lloyds Pharmcacy Ltd [2015] EWHC 3153 (Pat) is the latest in a series of decisions in the ongoing patent infringement dispute over pregabalin, a generic version of Lyrica. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:39 am
The invalidity attacks covered almost the full range of grounds: obviousness, lack of novelty, lack of entitlement to priority, and added matter, as well as insufficiency.There was no dispute that, if the patent were found valid, Merck's proposed dealings in its product for treating metastasised or non-removable melanoma would infringe. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
-> What the groundbreaking Schrems v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Software Patents Back To The Fore in India http://t.co/sJtaooRu4A -> No Copyright in the title of a literary work says court in India http://t.co/Gft0Vbe6Vi -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-10-15 http://t.co/Py8qeCyjrf -> Here's Warner/Chappell's Plan to Save the "Happy Birthday" Copyright http://t.co/xp5qd2qic0 -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-10-15: No change in US law, no data transfer deals – German state DPA h…… [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
Warner Bros. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 4:20 am
": (Ray Charles Foundation v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 11:30 am
Accord Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:50 pm
This is the most significant first instance judgment of the year, dealing with important legal and procedural issues arising out of the “serious harm test” in section 1 of the Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
This post deals with a more mainstream IP topic, patent validity, which was the subject of the "Validity is king" breakout session. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:13 am
As Jeremy explains, it deals with the ‘Kit Kat’ chocolate-snack and its protection as trade mark.* A taste of things to come? [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
This Kat posted a short report of the Court of Appeal, England and Wales, judgment delivered by Lord Justice Floyd in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 556, and has in the meantime been cogitating and ruminating (hard as that is for a non-ruminant carnivore) on what it all means.To remind readers on where we were before this appeal decision, Warner-Lambert marketed the drug pregabalin for three authorised indications… [read post]
