Search for: "Deeds v. People" Results 141 - 160 of 650
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
While there has been some studies of the case of R v Wewar, there has not been an investigation into the extent of the legal debates arising after this case. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal considered the criminal proceedings initiated against the respondents in June 2017 when they were charged with offences contrary to the Representation of the People Act 1983, relating to election expenses. [read post]
29 May 2018, 9:30 am by Venkat Balasubramani
This is a lawsuit brought by Twitter users and the Knight Foundation against President Trump (and his social media strategist and press secretary). [read post]
6 May 2018, 3:16 pm by Giles Peaker
So there are housing law people to root for aplenty in July LALY awards. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
I am happy to report the publication of my article,  "The Corporate Social Responsibilities of Financial Institutions for the Conduct of their Borrowers: The View From International Law and Standards," Lewis & CLark Law Review 21(4):881-920 (2018). [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:34 am by Tessa Shepperson
It is a serious commitment and people should take care before they sign it. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:34 am by Tessa Shepperson
It is a serious commitment and people should take care before they sign it. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:00 am by Jack Goldsmith
 The editor of the book, my colleague Cass Sunstein, says this in the introduction: This is not a book about Donald Trump, not by any means, but there is no question that many people, including some of the authors here, think that Trump’s words and deeds have put the can-it-happen-here question on the table. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:19 am by Dave
  If the agreements were, as he held, yearly tenancies, their oral grant would have been effective under s. 5492), but their assignments could only be made by deed: Crago v Julian [1992] 1 WLR 372. [read post]