Search for: "Defendant Doe 1"
Results 141 - 160
of 45,999
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2008, 1:48 pm
The right of confrontation does not apply at a suppression hearing. [read post]
15 May 2008, 4:55 am
In the second "John Doe" case, targeting University of Maine students, Atlantic v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 6:09 am
The fact defendant was acquitted on the underlying traffic offense does not mean that there was no probable cause. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 1:20 pm
A Jacksonville criminal defendant that falls under category (1) or (2) above can still receive a withhold of adjudication in the following situations:the prosecutor requests it in writing orthe court makes a written finding that a withhold of adjudication is reasonable. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 5:54 am
But the requisite nexus does not require certainty. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 3:41 pm
John Doe Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00071-RLM-RBCFile Date: Thursday, March 14, 2013Plaintiff: Malibu Media LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 3:22 pm
Does 1-38, targeting North Carolina State University students, which was dismissed as to all but one of the John Does for misjoinder.The RIAA commenced separate actions against some of the John Does, and in two of those cases, SONY v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 8:37 pm
Neither defendant nor the consenter were at the house when the consenter was asked. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 9:37 am
Earlier this month, the Court ruled that: (1) a party must “prevail” before it can recover any attorney’s fees under the DTSA and (2) a plaintiff’s dismissal of its claims without prejudice does not confer the “prevailing party” status on defendants. [read post]
18 May 2007, 8:33 am
This simply does not indicate that this defendant's case could not have been tried prior to July 24, the final trial date for speedy trial purposes. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 8:30 pm
When the defense lawyer does not know those risks, s/he should be ready to check with a qualified immigration lawyer or to advise the defendant to do so. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:04 am
The court finds that Gant does not apply to houses. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:23 am
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, et al, No. 69569-0-1 (Wash. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:39 am
LEXIS 1 (January 13, 2012): We agree with the trial court that the defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the area from which the police officers observed her house and smelled an odor of marijuana emanating from its air vent. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 7:23 am
"Plaintiff does not appear to challenge the contention that venue in this Court is improper. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 11:00 am
Male Criminal Defendants Outnumber Female by More than 3 to 1 is a post from: LegalMatch Law Blog [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 6:57 am
The record does not show that defendant was seized, and defendant did not show that he wasn’t free to leave, so he did not show a Fourth Amendment violation. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 3:17 am
Judge Kendall: 1) denied defendant Doe 15′s motion to dismiss; 2) denied Doe 15′s motion to quash the subpoena of Doe 15′s internet provider; 3) granted Doe 15′s unopposed motion to remain anonymous; and 4) severed each of the 15 defendants, except for Doe 15 in this Bit Torrent copyright case. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:11 am
Does 1-31, No. 16 C 6803, Slip Op. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 1:11 pm
Does 1-4577, one of the mass file sharing "John Doe" cases, involving motion pictures, following the RIAA model, the judge has ruled that the plaintiff is required to show a basis for suing defendants in the District of Columbia court.The ruling came about in the context of an order partially granting plaintiff's motion to extend time to serve defendants.Order partially granting motion for extension of time to make serviceThe defendants… [read post]
