Search for: "Department of Commerce v. United States House of Representatives"
Results 141 - 160
of 334
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2019, 10:37 am
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenesisolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 8:13 am
Editor’s Note: An earlier version of this post ran on April 2, 2019, as an introduction to this blog’s symposium on Department of Commerce v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 10:59 am
” [United States v.] [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am
It observes that the prohibition is irrevocable, which is unique to Huawei and one other company (ZTE Corporation, which Trump controversially rescued from a Commerce Department punishment last year). [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:38 am
Department of Commerce v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 11:18 am
House of Representatives in support of the respondents in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 2:20 pm
Department of Commerce. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
” In Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:29 am
For example, former Speaker of the House Paul Ryan and Sen. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am
Three cases – Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
It represents a shifting of coercive power from the external-the state, the police, and the institution to the internal-the individual and the private. [read post]
Frenemies at Last?: How Legislative History Could Save Justice Kavanaugh’s Opinion in Azar v. Allina
13 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
Yet, in Azar v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
United States, 17-778, United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:21 am
He has also said the court should scrap the dormant commerce clause, the doctrine that says that because Congress regulates interstate commerce, states can’t interfere with such commerce. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 11:54 am
House of Representatives has promised to make health care a top issue in the 116th Congress. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 7:41 am
In Texas v. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 3:52 pm
Nonetheless, the Supreme Court has already ruled that at least some asset forfeitures are covered by the Clause in the 1998 case of United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
In its ruling in Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm
AAA called for Ohio’s House of Representatives and Senate to pass the bill before the end of the year. [read post]
