Search for: "Department of Justice v. Spring"
Results 141 - 160
of 588
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2013, 6:19 am
Additional Resources:U.S. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 6:19 am
Additional Resources:U.S. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:00 am
McNeill v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:00 am
McNeill v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 5:55 pm
John Nichols wrote a great article for The South Carolina Lawyer Bulletin for Spring 2008 discussing the admissibility of expert's opinions pursuant to Rule 702, and the lack of necessity for South Carolina to adopt the federal standard described as Daubert for the infamous 1993 decision Daubert v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
We’ve covered this case, Liu v. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 8:13 am
Ever since I used a flat-fee real estate broker to sell my condominium in the spring of 2005, I have been interested in the plight of nontraditional (read: less than 6%) residential real estate brokers and non-broker innovators across the country. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 6:13 am
According to a complaint by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice, none of that was true. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 3:40 am
” At The Economist, Steven Mazie writes that after last week’s oral argument in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:54 pm
Department of Commerce and Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 6:15 am
Take Kentucky v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:00 am
STATE V. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 5:35 pm
Early last month the Department of Justice filed a “Statement of Interest” in Migyanko v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 12:49 pm
Calogero and Leclerc v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 6:30 am
Perhaps distinct among university departments, law schools have a close and delicate relation with political power. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
Glatt v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 7:33 pm
., in the Spring or late Winter of 2003.)According to Mukasey, it is unthinkable that "the same department that authorized the program would now consider prosecuting somebody who followed that advice. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:47 pm
Meanwhile, the Justice Department has petitioned for certiorari on this question in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:48 am
” Crystal Springs Capital, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 5:52 pm
Section 5 is the “preclearance” section, which requires nine stats and several smaller jurisdictions throughout the country to receive approval from the Justice Department before making changes to their voting procedures. [read post]
