Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs" Results 141 - 160 of 3,907
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2023, 7:26 am by Kalvis Golde
Only 3% of eligible RoundUp purchasers signed up through the claims process to receive funds from the $39 million settlement. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 1:36 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The limit here is the direct harm requirement; there is no purchase/use requirement. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 1:52 am
  The Court thus concluded that the causal link between the U.S. conduct and the plaintiffs’ alleged injuries was direct and immediate.It is unclear whether the underlying settlement will go forward given the Eleventh Circuit’s ruling that the district court has subject matter jurisdiction over the F-Cubed plaintiffs  (F-Cubed plaintiffs were not included in the settlement). [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 4:29 pm by Kevin LaCroix
"   Judge Berman didn’t stop there, but went on to consider the applicability of the Exchange Act to the claims of the third named plaintiff, UFCW, which had purchased ADRs over the counter in the United States. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 9:21 am by Thomas D. Nevins
The plaintiffs here first sought to meet the test through direct proof of lost sales to favored purchasers. [read post]
16 May 2019, 3:10 pm by Shahid Buttar
The justices didn’t rule on whether Apple’s conduct violated the antitrust laws, but they ruled that the plaintiffs are direct purchasers, and that their suit should proceed in the district court. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:56 am
Defendants are directed to serve a copy of this order with notice of entry upon the plaintiff and file proof thereof with the clerk's office. [read post]
27 May 2010, 10:43 am
The Co-Defendant had no active or direct relationships with any of Plaintiff's purchasers and had even signed an agreement with the Plaintiff that prohibited the Co-Defendant from engaging in any active relationship or exchanging information with visitors to the Co-defendant site. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 2:38 pm by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
The defendant in the case was a real estate developer that purchased property located across the street from the plaintiff’s house. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 12:41 am by John Day
Here, the write offs that Tucker’s healthcare providers applied to his medical bills were a direct result of the benefits negotiated by his health insurance company, which is a source independent of the tortfeasor. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:36 pm
  The plaintiffs alleged that they purchased DRAM abroad at supra-competitive prices due to defendants’ price fixing activities. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 1:05 pm
However, it was not a “proper plaintiff” to maintain the antitrust action.Standing was lacking based on the considerations delineated in the U.S. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 3:17 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
While the Court rejected plaintiff’s argument that the “Declaratory Judgments Act requires the joinder of all parties who claim an interest that might be affected by the declaratory judgment regardless of the directness or proximity of their claim,” it ruled that plaintiff here was an indispensable party: [W]e determine that the mandatory nature of liability insurance or other proof of financial responsibility renders the interest of an injured motorist… [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 2:48 pm
The following year SAR purchased a parcel of land in the Bronx. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 5:01 am by Unknown
The plaintiff directed the third party to send a check for the purchase price of shares in the company to the company’s business manager rather than to the plaintiff. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 4:04 pm by admin
The first to file was Watkins Inc., who  sell spices and herbs in direct competition with McCormick. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 5:58 am by John Jascob
The defendants sought dismissal of these claims on the basis that the plaintiffs did not tie every purchase to a relied-upon statement; instead, they listed year-long periods and estimated the number of purchases made. [read post]