Search for: "District of Columbia v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board" Results 141 - 157 of 157
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2009, 10:23 pm
For example, Sections 2510, 2588 and 3013 of the Education Law, among other sections, controls with respect to the layoff of tenured teachers and administrators employed by a school district or a BOCES.In addition, Rules of the Board of Regents must be considered. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
(Class 46) Council Regulation 1229/2008 enters San Simón da Costa (PDO), Ail blanc de Lomagne (PGI), Steirischer Kren (PGI) into Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Class 46) Court of First Instance, consolidating four appeals, annuls decisions of Board of Appeal and awards costs to Budvar in proceedings over BUD appellation: Budějovický Budvar, národní podnik v… [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
After hearing, the motion is ALLOWED in part. 1 Plaintiff asserts violations of the false claims acts in California, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Nevada, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, District of Columbia, and New York. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Dudas Issue: Whether the director of the Patent and Trademark Office lacked constitutional authority to appoint members of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, and, if so, whether the board’s decision below must be vacated as a result. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
: (Part 1 - SPICY IP), (Part 2 - SPICY IP)   Global – Copyright International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI): ‘Three strikes’ effort hit worldwide home run: (Ars Technica), How to attribute a Creative Commons licensed work: (Molly Kleinman), Chrysalis disappoints, as new artists fail to incubate: (IP finance), DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt)     Events 26 August:… [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
interview: (IP tango) Events 7 July: PLI briefing webcast ‘Life after Quanta v LGE: What every patent lawyer needs to know’: (PLI), 7-15 July/16-18 July: 2nd Transatlantic IP summer academy, modules one and two – Alicante/Milan: (IPKat), 9 July 2008: ALI & ABA webcast ‘Quanta v LG: What you should know’: (Patent Docs), 11 July: CIPA moot to improve participants’ understanding of procedures of EPO Technical… [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 12:36 am
Title690 S1325B LANZA -- Creates the thirteenth judicial district consisting of the county of Richmond 689 S6521 MAZIARZ -- Makes provisions for the deaths or permanent or temporary disabilities of employees of voluntary hospitals in connection with the World Trade Center attacks 688 S6514 NOZZOLIO -- Relates to compensation, benefits and conditions of employment for certain state officers and employees who are members of the… [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:20 am
Marion City Election Board (07-21) and Indiana Democratic Party v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:22 am
"  Ross Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:40 am
Pakhomious Coptic Orthodox Church an application for a real property tax exemption 599 A7936 Jaffee -- Authorizes Congregation Ribnitz, Inc. to retroactively apply for a property tax exemption 598 A7905 Lopez V (MS) -- Relates to the shelter allowance for individuals and families receiving public assistance and residing in city, state, or federal public housing 597 A7892 Brook-Krasny (MS) -- Relates to shareholder votes in mutual… [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
A municipality sought a similar tort-based tax in District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 Sep 2006, 9:06 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia that a case-by-case analysis is required to determine if the remedy is appropriate. [read post]