Search for: "Doe Shareholders 1-100"
Results 141 - 160
of 747
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2020, 5:29 am
This tax election allows the corporation to enjoy a unique combination of benefits if it meets the following requirements: it has less than 100 shareholders all of its shareholders are United States citizens, residents, special trusts, or certain estates it has only one class of stock its membership is not comprised of any partnerships or corporations Certain types of financial institutions and insurance companies are prohibited from electing Subchapter S treatment even if… [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:21 am
BlackRock represented to FERC that it is solely an investor and does not directly own physical utility assets in the U.S. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 4:05 am
Does your company require executives to comply with HSR filing requirements upon acquiring company shares: - Yes, and they have been for a while - 39% - Yes, but only recently because of this enforcement action - 16% - No - 45% 2. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 7:00 am
The Takeover Code does not allow for some conditions present in some U.S. deals (like due diligence or financing conditions) and requires disclosure of all investor holdings (including derivatives) over 1 percent of the outstanding during the takeover period, providing detailed insight into a target's shareholder base. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:05 am
And where does this money come from generally? [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 7:00 am
The SEC is alleging that the Defendants made over 100 million dollars in profits. [read post]
7 May 2018, 10:25 pm
("TERI") guaranteed full repayment on the Loans by agreeing to purchase a Loan for 100% of the Loan's outstanding principal balance, plus all accrued interest, whenever a borrower failed to make payments on a Loan for a specific number of days, went bankrupt, or died. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 10:47 pm
The story: 1. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 7:31 pm
How does $17 plus taxes sound? [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 4:09 pm
Unlike a C-Corp, however, an S-Corp can have no more than 100 shareholders who must be U.S. residents, nor can it be owned by other C-Corps, trusts, LLCs, or partnerships. [read post]
6 May 2015, 12:32 pm
Second, does it create income that the corporate tax reaches? [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
The following 4 reasons explain why: 1. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:01 am
Fund 1 (In Re Lyondell Chemical Co.), 2014 WL 118036 (Bankr. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 12:47 pm
S-corporations are limited to no more than 100 shareholders, and all shareholders must be United States citizens or permanent residents. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 9:22 am
Woloohojian, 158 F.3d 1, 6 (1st Cir.1998) (applying Rhode Island law). [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 7:59 am
While it correctly identifies the Second (100%) as among the three most reversed, it (mis)identifies the Sixth (100%) and Eleventh (75%) as most reversed and does not pick up that the Federal Circuit (66.7%) was so frequently reversed. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 3:08 pm
1. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 9:08 am
Consequently, the ordinance does not require employers to offer such pre-tax transportation benefits to independent contracts, partners and two percent shareholders of S-corporations. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
The third claim for mismanagement does not survive [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 10:00 pm
The third claim for mismanagement does no [read post]
