Search for: "Doe v. Anderson et al"
Results 141 - 160
of 187
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2015, 9:53 am
Rumsfeld, et al. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 2:41 pm
Even before the COVID-19 pandemic, businesses around the world had been bracing for the financial and operational impact of the new California Consumers Privacy Act (“CCPA”), which took effect January 1, 2020. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
” Takeaways Disclosure of Material Relationships with Financial Advisors While financial advisors and their clients need to be mindful of the Delaware Court of Chancery’s increasing focus on potential conflicts of interest, this ruling does not generally require disclosure of the aggregate fees paid to a financial advisor by the target and the acquiror for any given period of time (but see In re Art Technology (Oracle) (VC Laster 2010). [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:40 pm
-Anderson v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:00 pm
Introduction and The Process This semester, classmates Austin Anderson and Jack Garvey of Widener University Delaware Law School, were tasked with drafting an amicus curiae brief to the Montana Supreme Court on behalf of Youth Plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm
”[18] Given the zero cost to procure short reports, plaintiff class action litigators are incentivized to rely on them as evidence “to recover the losses investors suffer due to [alleged] corporate misconduct,” according to the “Activist Short-Sellers Are The Dark Knights Of Wall Street” authors, even if such work product is curated to inflict maximum impact on the stock price.[19] According to a Bloomberg reporter, “[a]ctivist short sellers such as Nathan… [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 2:51 pm
In County of Sacramento v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm
Brott v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 1:29 pm
Anderson v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
(trochar) Deposition2000-01-16 Doe v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
(trochar) Deposition2000-01-16 Doe v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
In Anderson v Anderson, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2023 WL 8246131, 2023 N.Y. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
This anxiety about a representative – or reflective – judiciary was captured most vividly in the Supreme Court’s decision in R.D.S. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
. ~~~ Filed 1/27/11 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE CLAUDIA JACQUELINE ACEVES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
Just because the American people sometimes make choices that policymakers find distasteful, it does not mean that citizens don’t have good choices at their disposal. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 3:52 pm
The article does not disclose the nature of Dr. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
The original article on which this revised version is based was originally written before the initial decisio in FDIC v Perry was reported (about which decision, refer here). [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
With this chapter we consider the last strand of U.S. law and governance sources—the acceptance of systems of rule making, governance, that does not emanate from the state. [read post]
