Search for: "Doe v. Becerra" Results 141 - 160 of 273
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2020, 6:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
Becerra, written by Judge Bridget Bade and joined by Judges Johnnie Rawlinson and Mark J. [read post]
27 May 2020, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
Doe, a petition “urging the court to uphold its tradition of protecting the rights of protesters. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am by Dave Maass
Kate Brown The Enemy of the Press Award: California Attorney General Xavier Becerra The Stupid, Dumb, F**king Idiot Award for Political Interference: U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am by Dave Maass
Kate Brown The Enemy of the Press Award: California Attorney General Xavier Becerra The Stupid, Dumb, F**king Idiot Award for Political Interference: U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 4:26 pm
  After all, the money flows the way it does regardless.That said, try as I might -- and I've tried hard -- I can't exactly tell what Justice Jones is trying to say in this opinion.If her point is that the trial court awarded $1.4 million in fees and costs to California and that wasn't an abuse of discretion given these facts, yep, right on. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 10:52 am by Whitney Jones Roy and Angela Reid
  Specifically, the Court found that declining to hear Cal Chambers’ claim was appropriate because Cal Chambers appeared to be seeking to avoid an unfavorable decision in a state case (CERT v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
Becerra, 19-251, and Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 11:31 pm by Orin S. Kerr
S.Ct. 2014) ("[f]ederal law does not supply an alternative basis for investigating possession of one ounce or less of marijuana"). [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 11:30 am by John Elwood
Courts of Appeals for the 1st, 4th and 11th Circuits hold; does it instead create a jury question, as the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am by John Elwood
Becerra, 19-251Issue: Whether the exacting scrutiny the Supreme Court has long required of laws that abridge the freedoms of speech and association outside the election context – as called for by NAACP v. [read post]