Search for: "Doe v. Board of Medical Examiners"
Results 141 - 160
of 750
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2021, 10:39 am
Chudik v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
Slip Op. 00352(3d Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that jurisdiction over a neglect proceeding does not depend upon the situs of the neglect. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am
Slip Op. 00352(3d Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that jurisdiction over a neglect proceeding does not depend upon the situs of the neglect. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 8:04 am
Updated H-V, 2.7 instead instructs examiners to issue summons to oral proceedings if an applicant does not implement the requested description amendments. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 6:45 am
According to newly published EEOC guidance, employers, in general, can require employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19 and have determined that administration of a vaccine is not a medical examination under the ADA. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:26 pm
The details regarding the 2020 filings, summarized below, are examined in my recent annual federal court securities class action filings report, here. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 8:49 pm
In Schuyler Farms Limited v Nesathurai, the Health Services and Appeal Review Board reviewed an order made by the Medical Officer of Health of Haldimand Norfolk Health Unit for all employees and seasons workers, pursuant to s. 22 of the Health Protection and Promotion Act. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 6:34 am
The court declined to consider whether the restrictions were reasonable, relying on a regulation adopted by the Board of Psychological Examiners the prior year: A licensee shall not participate in offering or making a partnership or employment agreement that restricts the right of a licensed health care professional to practice the licensed profession after termination of the relationship, except an agreement concerning benefits upon retirement. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
Tallent v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 11:00 pm
And where does the journey of retrofitting IP laws start? [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 6:44 am
This case, based on an investigation by the Texas State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners (“TBVME”) into Dr. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 3:21 am
Examining Attorney Barbara A. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in Franklin v. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 5:43 pm
On the first examination, Dr. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 9:36 pm
In Kestel v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 5:08 am
State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 5:00 am
GEICO case in which the majority attempted to eradicate the household exclusion across the board. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:38 am
This part examines litigation over how election officials verify that the person who casts a mail ballot is the intended voter and when officials may reject ballots that do not meet the verification requirements. [read post]
