Search for: "Doe v. Providence Health Plans"
Results 141 - 160
of 3,769
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2011, 8:43 am
It does not provide for the federal government to create health care exchanges. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 3:28 am
See English v. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 7:11 am
The homes provide health coverage to their employees through a self-insured "church plan" administered by a Catholic-affiliated non-profit corporation. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 6:02 am
It is styled, Nancy Koehler v Aetna Health, Inc. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 1:43 pm
In withdrawing the proposed rule, CMS cites the Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 6:46 pm
"Does this strike you as a little creepy? [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 5:00 pm
Health Fund et al v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:59 am
OCR noted that the Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 11:35 am
In Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 2:26 pm
Here, the Court said that the ordinance does not require an employer to adopt an ERISA plan or provide specific benefits through an ERISA plan. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:30 pm
The new statute does not provide a pre-suspension hearing procedure. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:00 am
The Town also offers both town justices the opportunity to participate in its employee health insurance plan. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:00 am
The Town also offers both town justices the opportunity to participate in its employee health insurance plan. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:51 pm
Since the Supreme Court’s June 28, 2012 National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
31 May 2014, 12:41 pm
Specifically, the court wrote: ” [T]his does not mean that all conduct of medical care providers is beyond the reach of that statute. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am
The Health Plan Excess Fee Case Filed Against Johnson and Johnson In Lewandowski v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 2:32 pm
Among these is a bill that would block funding to organizations that provide crucial reproductive health care to low-income women, like Planned Parenthood. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:49 am
”The Geissal case involved an employee who was covered under both his employer’s health insurance plan and as a dependent under his spouse’s health insurance plan at the time he was terminated from employment and made a timely election to continue in the employer’s group health plan as provided by COBRA.The fact that both plans provided similar coverages was held irrelevant. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:05 pm
Jackson Women’s Health, the case that overturned Roe v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 10:17 am
This does not afford the provider a complete remedy, because the state law in question may be preempted by ERISA with respect to health plans obtained by the patient through his or her employer, and because even if the law is not preempted in a given case, it does not provide a minimum reimbursement amount, leaving the health plan with the option to unilaterally calculate the usual and customary rate in the manner most … [read post]
