Search for: "Does, A-H" Results 141 - 160 of 16,489
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2024, 8:52 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
It is the rare case that warrants en banc review, and the rarest of the rare that does so in the absence of a conflict among courts. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 2:25 am by Carl Shusterman
This TFR does not extend the length of parole. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
These results were notable in that deep-in-the-money options accounted for less than 2 percent of all trading volume in the sample, thereby demonstrating that low volume does not indicate inefficiency. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 1:37 pm by John B. Palley
He does a nice job incorporating humor into a tough subject… D-E-A-T-H! [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 12:44 pm by Robin E. Kobayashi
” This seems to be an appropriate use of MTUS/ACOEM, which are guidelines, and it seems unlikely that any reasonable analogy would be challenged as “in excess of the administrative director’s powers” or “a plainly erroneous express or implied finding of fact” under Labor Code § 4610.6(h)(1) and (5). [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 12:26 pm by Lexi Coghe
After being pushed into an early retirement in 2017, he initiated a legal action under the Wendell H. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:50 am by Jonathan H. Adler
I was skeptical of these arguments here, but it does indicate the sort of standing theory that might work. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 12:53 pm by Dimo Michailov
   Normally, employers seek to hire a foreign worker on H-1B status and then the employer does a green card sponsorship. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:15 am
[The new Broadway] production does not traffic in such subtleties.... [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 7:17 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Moreover, the FDA's loosening of the regulation of mifepristone does not implicate such conscience claims (nor does the remedy that the plaintiffs seek–regulating mifepristone more stringently–does not align with the injury claimed). [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 6:21 am by Jonathan H. Adler
" Standing to challenge one agency action does not necessarily establish standing to challenge another. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:15 am
It should be noted that Section 266(h) expressly states that all causes of action remain vested in the entity to which a corporation has been converted. [read post]