Search for: "Does 1 - 107" Results 141 - 160 of 1,644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
*Certain residents of the school district [Petitioner] asked the Commissioner of Education to annul the Board's resolutions, contending that the Board's actions were arbitrary and capricious because the Board did not, among other things:  (1) discuss the resolutions at a public meeting; (2) provide a rational basis for their decision; (3) collaborate with district professionals; or (4) consider actual curricular needs, adverse consequences or relevant data.The Commissioner… [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The decision contains an interesting paragraph dealing with the emotional style of the petition, and possible consequences as to its admissibility.[4] It appears to the EBA that the petition was filed within two months of notification of the decision in question, that the petitioner was adversely affected thereby, that the prescribed fee has been paid in time, and that the petition complies with R 107(1)(b).[5] As regards R 106, the EBA notes that the petitioner argued, as regards… [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
*Certain residents of the school district [Petitioner] asked the Commissioner of Education to annul the Board's resolutions, contending that the Board's actions were arbitrary and capricious because the Board did not, among other things:  (1) discuss the resolutions at a public meeting; (2) provide a rational basis for their decision; (3) collaborate with district professionals; or (4) consider actual curricular needs, adverse consequences or relevant data.The Commissioner… [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:24 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Strouse & Jonathan TreemPages: 107-109The Slippery Slope Argument and Assisted Death: Which Approach to MAiD Does It Really Support? [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:21 am
When the number of uses and or registrations are substantial, the court held, this evidence may have probative value "on its face," even without proof of specifics regarding use of the third-party marks.Thanks again to The Trademark Reporter for granting permission to provide a link to this issue, which is Copyright © 2017 the International Trademark Association and reprinted with the permission of The Trademark Reporter®, 107 TMR 1 (January-February 2017).Read… [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
The defendant does not have to show that he has taken the minimum necessary, however. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 1:11 pm by Jessica Kroeze
As the contested decision was favourable in respect of this sole request, the Proprietor was not adversely affected by the decision and consequently the Proprietor's appeal is to be rejected as inadmissible, Article 107 EPC and Rule 101(1) EPC. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 1:11 pm by Jessica Kroeze
As the contested decision was favourable in respect of this sole request, the Proprietor was not adversely affected by the decision and consequently the Proprietor's appeal is to be rejected as inadmissible, Article 107 EPC and Rule 101(1) EPC. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Thus the appeal does not comply with A 107, first sentence, and has to be rejected as inadmissible under R 101(1).Request for reimbursement of the appeal fee[2] R 103(1) provides the conditions under which the appeal fee is to be reimbursed. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:47 am by Stacia Lay
  The introductory language in [section] 106 expressly states that all of the exclusive rights granted by that section . . . are limited by the provisions of [sections] 107 through 120. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 9:36 pm by Jason Rantanen
By Paul Cole[1]             How does the Supreme Court decision of 13 June 2013 match international opinion on the patentability of biological material? [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:57 pm by David S. Jones
 Desert Canyon was charged with failure to sign Section 2 of 107 I-9s, of which 93 were entirely left blank. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:56 am by Jessica Kroeze
The subsequent Auxiliary request 2 and Auxiliary request 3 both contained an additional independent claim (i.e., claim 2).Claims 1 and 2 of auxiliary request 2 were based on combinations of claims 1 and 2 and claims 1 and 9 as granted respectively. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 5:52 am by Bill Marler
As of October 17, 2016: 134 people with hepatitis A have been reported from nine states: Arkansas (1), California (1), Maryland (12), New York (3), North Carolina (1), Oregon (1), Virginia (107), West Virginia (7), and Wisconsin (1). 52 ill people have been hospitalized. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 4:02 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The appeal fee is not reimbursed if an appeal is inadmissible (Rule 103(1) EPC).Under Article 112(1)(b) EPC, the President of the EPO may refer a point of law to the Enlarged Board of Appeal where two boards of appeal have given different decisions on it. [read post]