Search for: "Does 1-205"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,000
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2021, 2:00 am
Issue 1: Did HMRC form the opinion required by section 205(3)(b) FA 2014? [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 11:28 am
In response to your solicitation of comments, we offer the following: [1.] [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 1:15 pm
(Decision #1, para.1) Decision #1 described Justice McLeod’s background based on an Agreed Statement of Facts. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 8:09 am
” Section 1708 makes clear that “[t]he President may exercise all authorities provided under sections 203 and 205 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1702 and 1704)”—including the record-keeping and reporting authority in § 1702(a)(2)—“to carry out this subsection. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:37 pm
However, bad faith does not appear to be cause in the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 7:51 am
However, if it does so, it is a deviation from the basic statutory formula and requires an analysis under the factors set forth in Domestic Relations Law § 240(1–b)(f). [read post]
18 May 2021, 12:00 am
Policy considerationThe policy underpinning s.55(1) is to respect private intellectual property rights, and a narrow interpretation of s.55(1) supports this ([164]).VII. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:55 am
Lower Capital Allowances Lead to Slower Economic Growth Any cost recovery system that does not allow the full write-off of an investment—full expensing—in the year the investment is made denies recovery of a part of that investment, inflates the taxable income, and increases the taxes paid by businesses.[9] Lower capital allowances increase the cost of capital, which leads to slower investment and a reduction of the capital stock, reducing productivity, employment, and… [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 7:32 pm
Junod, 217 So.3d 200, 205 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) and Punsky v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 9:07 am
__vfz=medium%3Dsharebar) does not change consumer, industry and government, nothing will. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 5:34 am
The appeal also featured an intervention from the Secretary of State for Defence, who argued that the authorisation should be option (1). [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 4:38 am
App. 2d 205, 210 (Ill. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 7:10 am
This month, a Superior Court judge, in the case of UMNV 205-207 Newbury, LLC v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
In Canada, one of the terrorist leaders, Jacques Rose, was given a standing ovation at the Parti Québécois[1] convention in Montreal on December 6, 1981. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 6:32 am
§ 29-20-205, provides that governmental immunity “is removed for injuries proximately caused by a negligent act or omission of any employee acting within the scope of his employment. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 11:45 pm
T 205/14, points 3.3 and 3.6). [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 11:45 am
Moorjani v Kilcoyne (Rev 1) (2020) EWHC 3463 (QB) The name of Moorjani may be familiar. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 8:31 pm
S. 205 (1972). [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:39 pm
’s statements otherwise, the majority “does indeed expand upon (and, I say, confuse) the law set forth in Bhasin” (Callow, Brown J., para. 152). [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 11:10 pm
S. 205 (1972)). [read post]
