Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 141 - 160
of 9,510
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2015, 9:50 am
Second, the district court found that use of the analytical methods of the '886 patent were protected under the safe harbor provisions of 35 U.S.C § 271(e)(1). [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 7:42 am
Note that 54(1) and 54(2) are parallel to 35 U.S.C. 102(a) while 54(3) is parallel to 102(a)(2) which the IPO does not propose to change. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 2:29 am
By Dennis Crouch Consider the text of new 35 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 5:22 am
The sign was applied for and registered for goods/services in Classes 25, 35, 43 in 2006. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 4:15 am
Does the 12 month Window of 35 U.S.C. 315(b) Ever Reset? [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 7:29 am
Florida does not, and remains one (1) of 15 states without a ban on sending text messages while driving. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 10:09 am
As criminal law grows, so does the West Key Number SystemNew Key Numbers for Criminal Law (topic 110)Criminal law has seen many changes in the last few years, particularly in areas such as the application of Miranda, the exclusionary rule, and the admissibility of the defendant's prior misconduct.West's response: As of August 1, more than 400,000 headnotes have been reclassified in the West Key Number System, particularly within Criminal Law (topic 110) and Arrest (topic… [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 1:22 pm
Glicksman (University of Kansas - School of Law and George Washington University - Law School) have posted Access to Courts and Preemption of State Remedies in Collective Action Perspective (Case Western Reserve Law Review, Vol. 59, No. 4, pp. 1-35, 2009) on SSRN. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 8:52 am
The amended claim begins: “1. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 2:29 pm
§ 271(e)(1) exemption. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:21 am
Last night, 35 legal bloggers, tweeters and journalists descended on 1 Crown Office Row chambers to debate the future of legal blogging. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 10:39 am
Section 102 also suggests that the claimed invention may already be “owned” prior to filing. 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1)(C). [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 7:51 pm
t said that the suppressed evidence "does not rise to the level of materiality that would be likely to cause a different result at a new trial. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 5:53 pm
Early that morning at around 1:30 a.m., the deadly accident was reported on Interstate 35 WB near Fossil Creek Boulevard. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:04 am
The post Paragraph IV to Paragraph III Conversion Does Not Deprive a District Court of Subject Matter Jurisdiction in Hatch-Waxman Cases appeared first on IP Law Alert. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 6:57 am
See § 1.116(b)(1)–(3). [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 5:10 am
What does the Clinton camp know? [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:13 am
The PTAB previously made two controversial rulings that were on appeal: (1) that under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) equivalents require explicit written description support and (2) that non-limiting Jepson claim preambles also require such support, even if they do not limit claim scope. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:53 am
Patent Nos. 6,510,434; 6,519,581; and 6,546,002 under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 2:21 pm
Earlier this year, we told you that Pittsburgh became the second city in Pennsylvania to enact a paid sick leave law, providing, in part, that employers were required to provide employees a minimum of 1 hour of paid sick time per 35 hours worked, with the maximum accrual dependent upon the number of the employees. [read post]
