Search for: "Does 1-54"
Results 141 - 160
of 3,361
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2012, 5:01 pm
It is therefore necessary, also in this case, to establish whether the indication of this use, which constitutes a method for treatment of the human body by surgery or therapy, may confer novelty to the claimed subject-matter.[4.2] As far as claims covering a method or a use are concerned, the EPC does not contain any explicit provision analogous to those applying to substances or compositions according to A 54(4) and A 54(5). [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 7:52 am
Published: 3/24/2011 10:54 AM [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 7:52 am
Published: 3/24/2011 10:54 AM [read post]
24 May 2021, 8:02 am
This offers coverage if the at-fault driver is not insured, does not have enough insurance or is not identified (hit-and-run). [read post]
24 May 2021, 8:02 am
This offers coverage if the at-fault driver is not insured, does not have enough insurance or is not identified (hit-and-run). [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 9:24 pm
Last week, a 54-year-old fisherman from New York drowned in the Round Valley Reservoir in Clinton Township. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 7:13 pm
Under the rules for federal judges, the investigation does conclude upon resignation. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 6:09 am
Rule 54(b) won't work, and you are left with.... 28 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
Moreover, claim 1 does not contain any additional feature related to any implementation in a therapeutic method.The particular approach to novelty created by decision G 6/83, therefore, does not apply to claim 1 of the main request, the subject-matter of which is equivalent to a process claim, i.e. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm
Alberta (aff’d ABCA; leave to appeal to SCC refused) as justified under s. 1 [56] The objective of the age requirement is similarly clear if one considers that, in the absence of an age requirement, babies meeting the citizenship and residency requirements would be eligible to vote. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
The Board thus concludes that the parameter “mean aspect ratio” is unclear and that claim 1 does not comply with the requirements of A 84 EPC 1973. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 8:22 pm
54(4)(a) does not apply.[26] The exception in s. [read post]
20 May 2014, 4:31 pm
Therefore, we will enter a new ground of rejection of claims 1-50, 53, and 54 as indefinite under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
The only documents that refer to the aspect ratio are not part of the state of the art within the meaning of A 54(2). [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 7:39 am
Not enough proofThis opponent tried to prove that Claim 1 of the main request had been orally disclosed. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:16 am
The opposition was based on Article l00(a) together with 52(1), 54(1) and 56 EPC and Articles 100(b) and (c) EPC. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:16 am
The opposition was based on Article l00(a) together with 52(1), 54(1) and 56 EPC and Articles 100(b) and (c) EPC. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:52 am
If the answer to question one (1) above is in the affirmative, does the trial court retain the discretion to grant or deny authorization for public expenditure for any such expert witness [or investigator] fee[s] based upon the trial court's threshold determination [that such services are reasonably necessary to formulate and present a defense]? [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
As claims 2 to 21 are dependent on claim 1, the request as a whole complies with the requirements of A 54. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:49 pm
As such, it offers temporary relief from penalties: IRS will not treat an HRA available for the expenses of family members not enrolled in the employer’s other group health plan for plan years beginning before January 1, 2016, as failing to be integrated with an employer’s other group health plan for plan years beginning before January 1, 2016. [read post]
