Search for: "Does 1-58" Results 141 - 160 of 2,932
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2020, 2:20 am by Thalia Kruger
The AG also rightly rejects the argument that the Posting of Workers Directive does not apply to road transport because its legal basis is the free movement of services, which would not apply to the transport sector because this sector is regulated separately in the transport title of the TFEU (see in particular Article 58(1) TFEU). [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:00 am
Second, the trade mark owner also argued that the prohibition of advertising prior to marketing authorization should constitute a “proper reason” for non-use under Art. 58(1)(a) EUTMR and that thus the five-year grace period should be suspended until marketing authorization. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 3:11 pm by LindaMBeale
In other words, the public does not support “revenue neutral” corporate tax reform. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 9:11 am by PaulKostro
Court Rules, comment 1 on Rule 4:58 (2012). [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 11:26 pm
 In 2013, Hecht-Pharma GmbH filed an application for revocation of the trade mark for lack of genuine use under Art. 58(1)(a) EUTMR. [read post]
16 May 2019, 6:00 am
And at a tax rate of about 6/10th's of 1%, quite affordable. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
’774 patent col. 2 l. 58–col. 4 l. 38 (ex parte reexamination certificate). [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 3:00 am
 The odds are about 50-to-1 that a prosecutor who is reported for prosecutorial misconduct will not receive even a slap on the wrist. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:06 pm by Edward J. Cyran and Corey Scher
  In prepared remarks on a call with Vice President Kamala Harris, Director Chopra noted that 58% of all third-party debt collection tradelines were for medical debt, making medical debt the most common debt collection tradeline on credit records in 2021. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:32 pm by Helen Macpherson
Ruling on question of ownership The Full Court unanimously ruled that ICI’s opposition in relation to ss 27(1)(a) and 58 should have been allowed. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:32 pm by Helen Macpherson
Ruling on question of ownership The Full Court unanimously ruled that ICI’s opposition in relation to ss 27(1)(a) and 58 should have been allowed. [read post]