Search for: "Does 1-99"
Results 141 - 160
of 3,292
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2019, 7:07 am
(Circular 1, Copyright Basics, section “Copyright Registration. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 6:41 pm
(Section 524(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code.) [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Claim 1 does not exclude the degradation (Abbau) of the proteins in a subsequent step because the claim is directed at a process comprising the steps (a), (b), and (c). [12] The argument of the [patent proprietor] according to which document D14 does not contain any reference to a clear solution is not persuasive either. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:01 pm
This corresponds to the principle of party disposition (Antragsgrundsatz; G 1/99 [6.2]). [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 4:43 pm
Today’s announcement will go a long way in making sure that cost does not prohibit women from planning their pregnancies. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:02 pm
No. 99-28, § XIII, 11-4-99; Ord. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
Insofar the revised rules confirm the existing practice. [1.3] What then does R 99(1)(c) require the notice of appeal to state in the present case? [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 6:40 pm
E-99-077 and E-99-076. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 1:09 pm
., a Montana Corporation, STATE OF MONTANA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, and DOES 1 to 99, Defendants and Appellants. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 8:33 am
Brennan, 1 N.J. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:46 pm
Brennan, 1 N.J. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 4:07 am
Things happen and clients do not discover it immediately; the objective wrongfulness of conduct does not become immediately apparent. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:44 pm
If G 1/18 is applicable, but the case is not stayed as the outcome on the merits of the appeal does not change, can a decision on the reimbursement/refund be made without staying in view of the relevance of G 1/18 on that decision (esp. as refund is not at the discretion of the EPO/Board)? [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 6:36 am
The lighting does not appear to be as plentiful as it is on other, more modern roads and the high number of fatal drunk driving accidents is also troubling. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:04 am
A non-linear response might be that cutting the exposure in half decreases the risk to 1-100,000, but that cutting it by 99% (the example given) decreases it to 1-1,000,0o0. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:19 am
Or, if 99% of the property used to be industrial, but 1% of it was used for anything else, none of the 99% can be converted to residential or parkland without an RSC. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 4:11 pm
Here are some reasons why not: 1. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 10:28 pm
§ 99-39-9 (1)(e) (2007), which legitimately questions the lethal injection protocolemployed by the State of Mississippi. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 1:44 am
Even when white-collar offenders are prosecuted and punished, rarely does that mean the crime victims get their money back. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 4:23 pm
Here is an excerpt, staring on p. 99: 311. [read post]
