Search for: "Don Barron"
Results 141 - 160
of 298
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2014, 12:04 pm
So even though you won't likely have to worry about a 12.6 million dollar insurance claim, your loved ones may very well find themselves in a fight as ugly and public as this Mick Jagger's ... if you don't work with your legal and financial professionals to complete your estate planning the right way [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 11:01 am
and attorneys with the Michigan law firm, Barron, Rosenberg, Mayoras & Mayoras, P.C. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:36 am
and attorneys with the Michigan law firm, Barron, Rosenberg, Mayoras & Mayoras, P.C. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:29 am
A) don't believe everything you see on video; B) ensure that mono-lingual claimants are presented documents in their native language; C) when an employer's attorney meets with a claimant, ensure that the claimant is also represented...Oh, and when a claimant, make sure you have all of your evidence in the record to support your damages claim. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 9:08 am
and attorneys with the Michigan law firm, Barron, Rosenberg, Mayoras & Mayoras, P.C. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:42 am
You don't need to be worth $80 million to follow this advice! [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 12:03 pm
and attorneys with the Michigan law firm, Barron, Rosenberg, Mayoras & Mayoras, P.C. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 1:06 pm
and attorneys with the Michigan law firm, Barron, Rosenberg, Mayoras & Mayoras, P.C. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:27 pm
and attorneys with the Michigan law firm, Barron, Rosenberg, Mayoras & Mayoras, P.C. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 5:09 am
The Barron’s article (and the Seeking Alpha article to which it refers) makes for interesting reading. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 8:18 am
In an order issued on June 10, the court (i) bifurcated the issues concerning disclosure of the Barron memo from the issues concerning the index of classified OLC documents; (ii) deferred decision on issues relating to the index; (iii) granted the government's request for further redactions from the Barron memo; and (iv) advised that it would publish the Barron memo, a revised version of its April ruling, and an opinion relating to the government's petition for… [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 1:46 pm
There are places where presidents don’t agree with what Congress does and we were often involved in some of those when I was involved in government. [read post]
19 May 2014, 2:04 pm
Don’t tell her what “pink slime” is. [read post]
8 May 2014, 5:36 am
They don’t like what they take to be his judicial philosophy: “In short, Barron is a judicial supremacist who wants to use the federal judiciary as a weapon to advance his hard-left political vision,” writes Severino. [read post]
6 May 2014, 6:52 am
Schragger is Perre Bowen Professor Barron F. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
Schragger is Perre Bowen Professor Barron F. [read post]
9 May 2013, 11:50 am
I don’t know her address! [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 11:18 am
As President of the State Bar of Georgia, I recently had the distinct honor and high privilege of being the keynote speaker for the DeKalb Bar Association's Annual Bench & Bar Dinner at the Emory Conference Center. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:12 pm
As David Barron and Marty Lederman have explained, the basic idea is “that the court is adjudicating a proceeding in which the target of the surveillance is the party adverse to the government, just as Article III courts resolve warrant applications proceedings in the context of conventional criminal prosecutions without occasioning constitutional concerns about the judicial power. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
Two variations of executive non-defense of statutes The two cases have an unusual feature in common, one that happens to be the source of the Court’s Article III questions – namely, that in both cases the highest executive branch officials have determined that the plaintiffs’ constitutional challenges to the laws in question are meritorious and accordingly have adopted an “enforce-but-don’t-defend” posture. [read post]
