Search for: "Don T Hart"
Results 141 - 160
of 865
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Expecting Corporate Prosociality The long-running corporate purpose debate often assumes stakeholder preferences for corporate prosociality are exogenous: Investors, employees, and consumers want corporations to be prosocial or they don’t. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 6:36 am
Also, you don't have to be an attorney to attend. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 4:54 am
I don't think a principled opinion along those lines could have been written at the time–"We don't know exactly how, but somehow this holding will importantly help undergird a more general movement toward women's equality, which movement is mandated by the Constitution" obviously doesn't make it–but I am clear that overruling it now would wreak havoc on that constitutionally legitimate movement. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:31 am
But the unknown unknown, that there's the stuff you just don't know you don't know. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
It does a great job demonstrating that the interplay between the First Amendment and the publicity rights is completely anarchy, which isn't surprising given that we don't really understand what we're trying to accomplish with the publicity rights doctrines in the first place. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 3:00 pm
Josh Hart is tearing it up for the Knicks. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 8:45 am
The smaller transactions escaped scrutiny the first time around thanks to the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act—the same law that mandates a look at bigger transactions. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:40 pm
We don’t know what to do, what to talk about, how to take in the entire thing,” said Maski. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 2:00 pm
The details of the theory don't matter, but let's assume you believe that inefficient legal standards create incentives for litigation and that a quasi-evolutionary process leads to the selection of efficient standards. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 3:39 pm
The details of the theory don't matter, but let's assume you believe that inefficient legal standards create incentives for litigation and that a quasi-evolutionary process leads to the selection of efficient standards. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 7:20 pm
I don’t know how many people would read a full-length biography about him. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 10:33 am
” “I don’t know how anybody could doubt his qualifications,” Husband says. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:14 am
See The Normal Rules Don't Apply When it Comes to Affordable Housing Projects. [read post]
27 May 2007, 5:28 am
The details of the theory don't matter, but let's assume you believe that inefficient legal standards create incentives for litigation and that a quasi-evolutionary process leads to the selection of efficient standards. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:33 pm
We don't see how it can fixed. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 6:18 am
Laypeople just don’t have enough knowledge of the law, or the court system, to represent their own interests effectively. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 7:39 pm
Before doing so, all I'll say here is that I don't see how a good Hartian can have any priors about language. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 8:45 am
Holland & Hart's Climate Change Law Blog found its way back from a 2 1/2 month hiatus and posted on December 10th. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 6:38 am
” NTSB Chairman Christopher Hart is shown saying, “A lot of that is something the consumers don’t have control over because they don’t know that they’re driving with a tire that’s subject to a recall. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:55 am
It would be totally inappropriate for the Court to revisit that question in this case and I don’t believe that it will. [read post]
