Search for: "Downloader 88"
Results 141 - 160
of 388
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2014, 4:50 pm
At download speeds of 3 megabits per second (Mbps), which is the Federal Communications Commission’s current approximate standard for basic broadband service, 98 percent of the population had a choice of at least two mobile ISPs and 88 percent had two or more fixed ISPs available to them. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:53 am
Rev. 55, 88-89 (2008). [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
You can download it to any eBook reader, including Kobo, Kindle, or even your smart phone or iPad or tablet. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 10:13 pm
(In 2012 the number was 89% and in 2011 the number was 88%.) [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 8:11 am
My 2014 Internet Law syllabus and updated casebook ($8 DRM-free PDF download) are now online. [read post]
26 May 2014, 10:05 pm
(In actuality, 88% of the TechnoLawyer survey respondents work in the U.S.; another 5% work in Canada.) [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
It made digital copies available for its Library Project partners to download for any uses that did not violate copyright laws. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
Consequently, the request for reimbursement of the appeal fee must be refused.Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
The arguments must be clearly and concisely presented to enable the board (and the other party) to understand immediately why the decision is alleged to be incorrect, and on which facts the appellant bases its arguments, without first having to make investigations on their own (see in particular the decisions T 220/83, T 213/85, T 145/88, T 169/89 and T 1581/08.[2.2.6] Moreover, it is also established case law that grounds sufficient for the admissibility of an appeal must be analysed in… [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
[…]The appeal is dismissed.Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
These findings were communicated to the parties during the OPs held on May 14, 2013, subsequent to the corresponding discussion and the deliberation of the Board.Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
In the Board’s opinion, since rejection of an opposition means maintenance of the patent, such rejection was made impossible by the proprietor’s disapproval of the text of the granted patent.Moreover, T 329/88 cited by the appellant concerns a different situation, namely one in which the opponent-appellant did not wish to continue the appeal proceedings after the patent had lapsed in all Contracting States. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
Should you wish to download the whole decision (in German), just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
Therefore, following the reasoning of decision G 2/88 [10] the purpose limitation was a technical feature providing novelty.[10] The board notes that decision G 2/88 [10.3] has held “with respect to a claim to a new use of a known compound such new use may reflect a newly discovered technical effect described in the patent. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
These effects are more like those in T 158/88 and T 603/89 than in T 26/86. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 5:46 pm
In 2009, about 22.5 million disposable bags were being given away each month; in January 2010, just 3 million bags were distributed – a nearly 88% decline in one month. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
T 227/88; T 472/88 and T 922/94). [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 9:33 am
Ct.) 88 Register.com v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
G 6/88 [2.5]). [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
T 836/01 and T 1642/06, on claims relating to second or further medical uses of a known substance and which acknowledged novelty in the case at issue based on the differentiation of a direct and indirect effect.[12] In view of the foregoing, the board is satisfied that the subject-matter of claim 1 at issue fulfils the requirements of A 54(1) and A 54(3) vis-à-vis the disclosure in document D1.Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be… [read post]
