Search for: "Downs v. Correctional Medical Services" Results 141 - 160 of 495
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2012, 7:25 am by Michael O'Hear
 However, the Supreme Court has generally taken a restrictive approach to Bivens actions since about 1980, including its decision in Correctional Services Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:19 am by Michael M. O'Hear
 However, the Supreme Court has generally taken a restrictive approach to Bivens actions since about 1980, including its decision in Correctional Services Corp. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 6:25 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Here are a few more of her greatest hits for those not hip to her work:Still Convicting the InnocentProsecutorial Exceptionalism: Remedial Skepticism, and the Legacy of Connick v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Michalak v General Medical Council & Ors, heard 4 Jul 2017. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:17 pm by Yosie Saint-Cyr
On January 6, 2006, at some point prior to the corrective action meeting, Herman Vijayakumar (a co-worker) was the target of a joke, where he was handed a toilet seat as an employee award in mockery of Canac’s service award. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
Please direct corrections, comments, questions, subscription requests and inquiries to Mr. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:00 am by Linda Ershow-Levenberg
In a Final Agency Decision just recently issued by the NJ Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services (DMAHS) in a case called S.W. vs Cumberland County Board of Social Services, the State has pronounced the rule. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Michalak v General Medical Council & Ors, heard 4 Jul 2017. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 4:25 am by Steven M. Gursten
Having had surgery to correct apnea and awaiting post-operative evaluation. 5. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:56 am by Russ Bensing
The appellate panel’s response in State v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 7:27 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
The appeals officer then considered the legal test for determining whether an employee is exposed to a “danger” as set out in Correctional Service of Canada v Ketcheson, 2016 OHSTC 19. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Medicaid Services: CUTS IN MEDICAID HOME SERVICES WILL HURT LOUISIANA, SUIT SAYS, Pitts v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 9:20 am by South Florida Lawyers
This is because, it says, the case does not meet the requirements for second tier review most recently articulated by Custer Medical Center v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
State, 636 So. 2d 494, 497 (Fla. 1994) (holding that the Court was required under Article I, § 17 of the Florida Constitution to strike down the death penalty for persons under sixteen at the time of crime); Shue v. [read post]