Search for: "Dunn v. Petit"
Results 141 - 160
of 212
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2012, 11:42 am
Dunn (1987) and implicates a circuit split with the Ninth Circuit about whether an absent co-tenant’s prior refusal to consent to a search invalidates the consent given by a physically present co-tenant under Georgia v. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 8:16 am
United States and Shell Oil v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 5:30 pm
Love Field.The Supreme Court is now considering whether it wants to review Love Terminal Partners v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
The Court initially considered this petition in October, but held it for Oneok Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:18 pm
Dunn v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 9:51 am
[Citing Dodson v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
[Opinion below (5th Circuit) / Petition for certiorari / Brief in opposition / Petitioner’s reply] Since we last published, obviously, the Court has decided Graham v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 12:10 pm
The justices granted all three petitions and consolidated the cases for one hour of oral argument. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 8:39 am
Circuit in PHH Corporation v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in this Term’s most important case addressing the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause, Town of Greece v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 10:19 am
Dunn 16-602 Issues: (1) Whether, to satisfy his Glossip v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 7:32 pm
This article by New York Civil Liberties Union attorney Christopher Dunn in the New York Law Journal about Occupy Wall Street’s activities at Zuccotti Park is essential reading on the subject of permit-less protests on public land: In Clark v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Fourteenth District of Texas. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
Finally, Dunn v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 3:59 am
Dunn). [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 3:42 am
It’s bad enough, both for substantive as well as factual reasons, that the Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 12:04 pm
Supreme Court's majority in Herrera v. [read post]
