Search for: "Dworkin v. Dworkin" Results 141 - 160 of 261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  For Sunstein, originalism is unable to accommodate cases such as Brown v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 9:49 am by J
Sella House v Mears [1989] 1 EGLR 65; (1989) 21 HLR 147. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 9:49 am by J
Sella House v Mears [1989] 1 EGLR 65; (1989) 21 HLR 147. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Bickel trusted the Court to discern our deepest “fundamental values,” such as a commitment to racial justice that required the invalidation of segregation in Brown v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 12:25 am by JR Chaves
«En una ocasión, en la época en que era juez de la Corte Suprema, Holmes llevó al juzgado en su coche al joven Learned Hand [quien más tarde sería el maestro de Dworkin]. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 1:47 am
Consider the 1998 case of Lewis v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 5:55 am by JB
What is fixed cannot be altered except through Article V amendment; and3. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
That is, after all, what Dworkin told us it meant first of all to be committed to his “right answer” theory of law and then to “taking rights seriously” if the law, properly understood, protected, them. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 9:46 am by Stephen Griffin
  In the process the article raises questions about how we should understand the scope of the achievement of those who sponsored and ratified the Reconstruction amendments.In the last part of “Optimistic Originalism” I discuss why Brown is commonly viewed as a “living constitutionalist” opinion (Here and elsewhere in these posts I put living constitutionalism in scare quotes because I think the real issue is how to understand the process of constitutional change outside… [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 7:24 am
US situation is interesting, especially in the political debate re: Roe v Wade. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
This sense of principle is illustrated by Ronald Dworkin's example of the principle that no one should be allowed to profit from their own wrong, drawn from the case of Riggs v. [read post]