Search for: "E. C. D."
Results 141 - 160
of 20,241
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2024, 1:55 pm
This is authorized as a secondary offence listed under s. 487.04 (c), (d) or (e), and the DNA order can be authorized regardless of if the Crown proceeds summarily or by indictment. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 am
Richard E. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 am
Richard E. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:50 am
The consultancy has five objectives:a) Conduct a comprehensive review of the Ombudsman office structure with a view to determining a fit-for-purpose structure. b) Evaluate the alignment of the office structure with the office’s mandate under ST/SGB/2016/7. c) Assess the workload distribution and efficiency of operations. d) Review the effectiveness of the cost sharing methodology and suggest improvement to ensure timely contributions from all participating organizations to… [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 1:19 am
The applicable standard of proof in respect of contempt of court is the criminal standard; d. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:21 am
According to Section 24 of the NDPA, a data controller or data processor shall ensure that personal data is: (a) processed in a fair, lawful, and transparent manner; (b) collected for specified, explicit, and legitimate purposes (c) adequate, relevant, and limited to the minimum necessary for the purposes for which the personal data was collected or further processed (d) retained for not longer than is necessary (e) accurate, complete, not misleading (f) processed in a… [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 3:02 am
The uninsured employer relying on the ERISA preemption could also face an assessment of 200% of the workers’ compensation premium for the period of non-insurance up to a maximum of three years pursuant to Labor Code §3722(c). [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
Boyd – C. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:56 pm
Code Section 197 allows ratable 15-year amortization for any “amortizable section 197 intangible”.[24] Purchased intangible assets are typically considered “section 197 intangibles” (and therefore mainly “amortizable section 197 intangibles”) while self-created (developed) IP is often – though not exclusively – ineligible for § 197 amortization.[25] Both (i) self-created intangibles described in § 197(d)(1)(D), (E),… [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
Opportunity (Ewers, McGillis, and Hutton) (3 Dec. 2015), aff’d McGillis v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
Tal como nas fórmulas do patético de Aby Warburg, não se distingue nelas criação e performance, original e cópia. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
Some of the first remanded cases went to the District of Oregon, where they landed in front of Judge Robert E. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
c. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Intitulé : R. c. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 3:04 am
” “A statement is not hearsay if….The statement is offered against a party and is (A) the party’s own statement, in either an individual or a representative capacity, or (B) a statement of which the party has manifested an adoption or belief in its truth, or (C) a statement by a person authorized by the party to make a statement concerning the subject, or (D) a statement by the party’s agent or servant concerning a matter within the scope of the… [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 3:13 am
Android kullanıcıları için Betwinner APK indirme işlemi son derece basit ve kullanışlıdır. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:33 pm
Sous le chef 1 de la plainte modifiée, dispose-t-il d’une preuve lui permettant de conclure que l’intimée a fait défaut de respecter les engagements qu’elle a souscrits auprès de la syndique adjointe de l’Ordre le 10 août 2019, et ce, en contravention de l’article 81 du Code de déontologie des pharmaciens ? [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm
In Daubert, the Supreme Court decided a legal question about the proper interpretation of a statute, Rule 702, and then remanded the case to the Ninth Circuit of the Court of Appeals for further proceedings. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
Brian D. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Last week, we had the opportunity to review the texts regarding the UPC “saisie”, the ex parte orders issued in the OERLIKON and C-KORE cases. [read post]
