Search for: "EPA v. Brown"
Results 141 - 160
of 236
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm
District Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong said the “Ninth Circuit’s holding in [Sierra Club v.] [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:59 pm
In Georgia Pacific v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:05 am
This case, called Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:40 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit applied the test outlined by Justice Anthony Kennedy in Rapanos v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 7:55 am
Olson argued that it would be much like orders created in the wake of Brown v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 3:00 pm
” In West Virginia v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 1:06 pm
Clorox Co. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
EPA Region 10 offices, located at 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 10:53 am
Neither EPA nor Oklahoma had challenged standing; the district court had granted summary judgment to EPA on the merits. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (21-454) Argued on October 3, 2022 This case goes back over a decade when an Idaho couple sought to develop a property lot that the EPA later determined was in a wetland area, which the EPA said it could regulate under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 6:45 am
In another case, United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 11:38 am
EPA, Kavanaugh (joined by Williams and Judge Janice Rogers Brown) rejected on standing grounds a challenge to the EPA’s refusal to set a secondary standard for carbon monoxide because he agreed with the agency that the connection to climate change was too speculative: “For the reasons identified by EPA, petitioners’ theory of causation is simply a bridge too far given the current record. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
– EPA News Release, March 26, 2010 U.S. [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:02 pm
., et al v. [read post]
