Search for: "ERICSSON INC"
Results 141 - 160
of 252
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2008, 2:29 am
Ericsson LM Telephone Co. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 4:19 am
’ Ericsson, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 1:58 pm
SimpleAir, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 11:49 pm
Here are the latest featured inhouse counsel jobs courtesy of GoInhouse.com – BigLaw job hunters should check out GoBigLaw.com for Biglaw jobs:Corporate Counsel, Compliance – STEC, Inc., Santa Ana, CAGeneral Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer – myYearbook, New Hope, PAIn-House Attorney – Confidential, MARY ESTHER, FLAssociate General Counsel – Rayonier, Olympia, WALegal Assistant to the General Counsel – Confidential, NEW YORK, NYGlobal Trade Licensing… [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 12:15 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 2:51 am
Motorola, Inc. and TCL v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 3:48 pm
The complaint names Sony Corporation, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., Microsoft Corporation, and Apple, Inc. as licensees to the asserted patents. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 5:15 pm
Motorola, Inc., 963 F. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 12:03 am
Court of Milan, July 2015 – Ical Spa, Italvideo International Srl and Cardmania Multimedia Srl vs Rovi Guides Inc., United Video Properties Inc. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:14 am
Indian Head, Inc., 486 U.S. 492, 501 (1988)) (485 F. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:28 am
The complaint alleges that LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea, LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, and LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc. of San Diego, California (collectively, “LG”) unlawfully and without authorization import into the U.S., sell for importation, and/or sell within the U.S. after importation certain mobile telephones and modems that infringe U.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 12:26 pm
(FOSS Patents coverage)July 9, 2012: Microsoft and Aluratek Inc. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
A Domain Name is Not Property. http://t.co/oXWTeYzVYh -> Court: Google infringed patents, must pay 1.36 percent of AdWords revenue http://t.co/lVPxj3JKT7 -> UKCA releases opinion on confidential information Personnel Hygiene Services Ltd & Anor v Rentokil Initial UK Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 29 -> State of the Union 2014 Full Text: Read Obama’s speech as prepared http://t.co/QvP6fYz6Xl -> Failure to Properly Plead Valid Copyright Registration Warrants Dismissal in US case… [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:32 am
" The suit named 19 defendants, including all of the major cell phone manufacturers and providers, as well as two trade associations: Nokia Inc.; Ericsson Wireless Communications Inc.; Motorola Inc.; Sprint PCS; Audiovox Communications Corp.; Nextel Communications; Panasonic Corp.; Philips Electronics North America Corp.; Qualcomm Inc.; Sanyo North America; Sony Electronics Inc.; AT&T Wireless Services Inc.; Verizon Wireless;… [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
* Washington Redskins' Trade Marks tackled: disparaging, says District CourtJani writes up Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 10:33 am
The week saw Ericsson, the Swedish giant in mobile network infrastructure manufacturing filing a patent infringement suit against Micromax, one of India’s largest domestic mobile handset manufacturers. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:13 pm
The complaint names Sony Corporation, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., Microsoft Corporation, and Apple, Inc. as licensees to the asserted patents. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 1:23 pm
Raskopf, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New YorkDavid Rosenberg, Vice President, IP Policy, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), LondonLaura Sheridan, Senior Patent Counsel, Google, New YorkJule Sigall, Assistant General Counsel – IP Policy & Strategy, Intellectual Property Group, Corporate, External & Legal Affairs, Microsoft Corporation, RedmondBradley Silver, Chief Intellectual Property Counsel, Time Warner Inc., New YorkBrad Smith, President and Chief Legal Officer,… [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 8:43 pm
AT&T Wireless Services, Inc., 177 Cal.App.4th 1235 (Cal.App. 2009) [Slip Opn., at 1-2]. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 4:15 am
Inc, TRW, Dentsply and other cases noted supra illustrate that more is required. [read post]