Search for: "Eddy v. State"
Results 141 - 160
of 331
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2015, 2:55 pm
Eddie Thomas, No. 110,585 (Johnson)Direct appeal; Felony murderKorey A. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:56 am
Ricci attended a meeting in which he was asked to speak in support of a fellow union member, Eddie Doyle. . . . [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 3:45 pm
Eddie Miller, Case No. 2:15-cv-290-JAD-PAL (D. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:12 pm
Hall v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 3:45 pm
The trial court repeatedly refuses to make findings that might allow a child to stay in the United States, thinking that he'd be better served if he made "a fresh start" by being deported to Juarez, Mexico. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:45 pm
Well, it depends on a “seismic” case we wrote about last April, and that was decided in September of 2014: Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:50 pm
Ct. 2498 Oracle America, Inc. v Google Inc. 750 F.3d. 1339 (CAFC May 9, 2014) Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:28 am
Sound recordings weren’t brought under the protection of federal copyright law until 1972 so are protected by state laws and some services, notably SiriusXM, haven’t been paying performance royalties to artists to play these older works prompting claims from both artists (with Flo & Eddie from the Turtles leading the charge), record labels and collection society SoundExchange. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:52 am
As I wrote previously, federal courts in New York and California ruled that pre-1972 sound recording owners do have an exclusive right of public performance under state and common law in lawsuits filed by surviving Turtle’s members Flo & Eddie, while a state court in California held the same in a lawsuit brought by major record labels. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am
See, Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 4:30 am
CyberLYNK ED Wisc 2014 http://t.co/RHsIKPgxL9 -> Decision denying Sirius' motion for reconsideration Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 2:31 am
The Hook & Sling master begins with Eddie Bo calling out “Are ya ready? [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:49 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:55 am
" More on the series of cases brought by the Turtles' Flo & Eddie here. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 2:21 pm
He may be convicted only if an impartial jury of his peers is unanimously of the view that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and so states, publicly, in its verdict. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:34 am
And Flo & Eddie filed putative class action suits in California, New York, and Florida. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm
In the case of Brown v Random House ([2014] NSWSC 1505) McCallum J dismissed an attempt to strike out the pleaded imputations in case brought by a person who was mistakenly identified as a business associate of disgraced former Labor powerbroker Eddie Obeid in the bestselling anti-corruption expose He Who Must Be Obeid. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 7:15 am
Supreme Court 1963 ruling in Brady v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:01 am
Music v. [read post]
