Search for: "England v. Cir*"
Results 141 - 160
of 2,591
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2023, 2:57 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 05/05/23) East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another, heard 20th October 2022 Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland and another v Agnew and others (Northern Ireland), heard… [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during April 2023 Eleven consistory court judgments were circulated in April concerning: Reordering, extensions and other building works CCVT Exhumation Churchyards and burials Organs This summary also includes CDM Decisions and Safeguarding, Reports from the Independent Reviewer, Privy Council Business, Visitations, and CFCE Determinations, as well as links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
1 May 2023, 3:35 pm
As the Supreme Court has become more conservative, the justices have grown less likely to defer to federal agencies under the 1984 precedent in Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 3:30 am
Apple FRAND (fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms) judgment in Optis v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
In Mr J Mitchell v Royal Mail Group Ltd (England and Wales: Religion or Belief Discrimination) [2023] UKET 1805473/2022, Royal Mail Group applied to strike out the claim that Mr Mitchell’s dismissal had amounted to direct discrimination or harassment related to religion or belief. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 9:47 pm
In 2011, a unanimous Supreme Court held in American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 8:28 am
Hill v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 2:19 am
The Parole Board for England and Wales (“the Board”) is responsible for deciding whether or not to direct the early release of prisoners serving various categories of sentences of imprisonment. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 1:00 am
This flows from the unique circumstances of the problematic positioning of this grave, the mistake flowing from that, together with the particular circumstances she has had regard to in the medical evidence. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 3:05 am
Z.o.o. and Ors v Jakubowski and Ors. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 2:47 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 24/03/23) East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another, heard 20th October 2022 Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland and another v Agnew and others (Northern Ireland), heard… [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
Newspaper Journalism and regulation Under new draft guidance by the College of Policing, police forces in England and Wales may soon be given the option to not release the names of people charged with offences, the Press Gazette reports. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:23 pm
The December 2022 decision of ‘New England Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:47 am
By Laura Dowdy Introduction On December 31st, each year, new creative works enter the public domain. [1] This means that while some artists/creators lose the right to preclude others from copying a work, others can create new works that utilize aspects of previously copyrighted works. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 5:21 am
MSCC is the owner of this canal, whilst UU is the sewerage undertaker for the North West of England, following the privatisation and reform of the sector in 1991. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
The Claim Summary ClientEarth, which has a token shareholding in Shell, filed the claim in the High Court of England and Wales as a derivative action under Part 11 of the U.K. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 12:53 pm
Toland v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 9:08 am
In Nunn v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:10 am
In the months since Republicans regained control of the U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 11:47 am
The facts of Peter Schmidt, about a winding up petition, and JK v MK, about a consensual divorce, were very different from those in the present case. [read post]
